From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] kvm: Pass kvm_irqfd to functions Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:24:30 +0200 Message-ID: <20120627162430.3477d0f6@BR9GNB5Z> References: <20120627044758.23698.249.stgit@bling.home> <20120627050858.23698.44118.stgit@bling.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: avi@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com To: Alex Williamson Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120627050858.23698.44118.stgit@bling.home> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:09:04 -0600 Alex Williamson wrote: > Prune this down to just the struct kvm_irqfd so we can avoid > changing function definition for every flag or field we use. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson I'm currently trying to find a way to make irqfd workable for s390 which will likely include using a new field in kvm_irqfd, so I'd like to have this change (and I also think it makes the code nicer to read). So: Acked-by: Cornelia Huck