From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 07/15] ARM: KVM: Hypervisor inititalization
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 22:07:07 -0300
Message-ID: <20120629010707.GA12611@amt.cnet>
References: <20120615190553.24590.18391.stgit@ubuntu>
 <20120615190759.24590.74953.stgit@ubuntu>
 <20120628223551.GD7767@amt.cnet>
 <CANM98qLJsT7tBDxJtssyDentufaL_KKSUvOxEqZNcqOBkO9N2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: android-virt@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Christoffer Dall <c.dall@virtualopensystems.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1026 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754303Ab2F2Bp7 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 21:45:59 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANM98qLJsT7tBDxJtssyDentufaL_KKSUvOxEqZNcqOBkO9N2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 06:53:43PM -0400, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > should assign per_cpu(kvm_arm_hyp_stack_page, cpu) to NULL.
> >
> 
> why? this is run as part of the init code and thus the only way it
> could ever run again would be to have the module unloaded in which
> case the variable would be re-initialized to zero as per the static
> declaration, no?

Right.