From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Will there be a qemu-kvm 1.1 version?
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:27:52 -0300
Message-ID: <20120629222752.GB12437@amt.cnet>
References: <OF36173751.0FDED5C3-ONC1257A2C.00298EB8-C1257A2C.00298EC1@pn-systeme.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Nico Prenzel <nico.prenzel@pn-systeme.de>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55060 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751392Ab2F2W16 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:27:58 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <OF36173751.0FDED5C3-ONC1257A2C.00298EB8-C1257A2C.00298EC1@pn-systeme.de>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 09:33:55AM +0200, Nico Prenzel wrote:
> I've seen on kvm devel list that there were serveral problems with the qemu-kvm 1.1 release: http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg73755.html
> 
> Since these last posts, there seems to be no movement with that release.
> So, will there be a qemu-kvm 1.1 release?

Yes, early next week, hopefully Monday.