From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 15:55:11 -0300 Message-ID: <20120703185511.GA24415@amt.cnet> References: <20120701150506.GA31304@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avi Kivity , Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120701150506.GA31304@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 06:05:06PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On UP i386, when APIC is disabled > # CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC is not set > # CONFIG_PCI_IOAPIC is not set > > code looking at apicdrivers never has any effect but it > still gets compiled in. In particular, this causes > build failures with kvm, but it generally bloats the kernel > unnecessarily. > > Fix by defining both __apicdrivers and __apicdrivers_end > to be NULL when CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC is unset: I verified > that as the result any loop scanning __apicdrivers gets optimized out by > the compiler. > > Warning: a .config with apic disabled doesn't seem to boot > for me (even without this patch). Still verifying why, > meanwhile this patch is compile-tested only. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > --- > > Note: if this patch makes sense, can x86 maintainers > please ACK applying it through the kvm tree, since that is > where we see the issue that it addresses? > Avi, Marcelo, maybe you can carry this in kvm/linux-next as a temporary > measure so that linux-next builds? Applied, thanks.