From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, amd: rename vmmu support capability Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 19:32:36 +0200 Message-ID: <20120714173236.GA32400@liondog.tnic> References: <1342202575.2706.4.camel@offbook> <20120714101951.GB26559@liondog.tnic> <0ffa7987-66fd-4c8d-85da-9911eee3eeaf@email.android.com> <1342276131.2956.6.camel@offbook> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , lkml , kvm list , x86@kernel.org To: Davidlohr Bueso Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:46411 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750915Ab2GNRcj (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jul 2012 13:32:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1342276131.2956.6.camel@offbook> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 04:28:51PM +0200, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Sat, 2012-07-14 at 15:38 +0200, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > Yep, NAK on this one. > > Ok, we could at least add a comment when defining X86_FEATURE_NPT. And the valid, sane, technical reason for having a comment where any internet search could do, is... ? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris.