From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: avi@redhat.com, agraf@suse.de, paulus@samba.org,
aarcange@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] KVM: Optimize MMU notifier's THP page invalidation -v4
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:56:28 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120718195628.GA18071@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120702175239.5fec56b3.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 05:52:39PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> v3->v4: Resolved trace_kvm_age_page() issue -- patch 6,7
> v2->v3: Fixed intersection calculations. -- patch 3, 8
>
> Takuya
>
> Takuya Yoshikawa (8):
> KVM: MMU: Use __gfn_to_rmap() to clean up kvm_handle_hva()
> KVM: Introduce hva_to_gfn_memslot() for kvm_handle_hva()
> KVM: MMU: Make kvm_handle_hva() handle range of addresses
> KVM: Introduce kvm_unmap_hva_range() for kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start()
> KVM: Separate rmap_pde from kvm_lpage_info->write_count
> KVM: MMU: Add memslot parameter to hva handlers
> KVM: MMU: Push trace_kvm_age_page() into kvm_age_rmapp()
> KVM: MMU: Avoid handling same rmap_pde in kvm_handle_hva_range()
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c | 47 ++++++++++++---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 11 ++++
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 8 +++
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 3 +-
> 7 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
>
> >From v2:
>
> The new test result was impressively good, see below, and THP page
> invalidation was more than 5 times faster on my x86 machine.
>
> Before:
> ...
> 19.852 us | __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
> 28.033 us | __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
> 19.066 us | __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
> 44.715 us | __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
> 31.613 us | __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
> 20.659 us | __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
> 19.979 us | __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
> 20.416 us | __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
> 20.632 us | __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
> 22.316 us | __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
> ...
>
> After:
> ...
> 4.089 us | __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
> 4.096 us | __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
> 3.560 us | __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
> 3.376 us | __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
> 3.772 us | __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
> 3.353 us | __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
> 3.332 us | __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
> 3.332 us | __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
> 3.332 us | __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
> 3.337 us | __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start();
> ...
Applied, thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-18 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-02 8:52 [PATCH 0/8] KVM: Optimize MMU notifier's THP page invalidation -v4 Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-07-02 8:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] KVM: MMU: Use __gfn_to_rmap() to clean up kvm_handle_hva() Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-07-02 8:54 ` [PATCH 2/8] KVM: Introduce hva_to_gfn_memslot() for kvm_handle_hva() Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-07-02 8:55 ` [PATCH 3/8] KVM: MMU: Make kvm_handle_hva() handle range of addresses Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-07-02 8:56 ` [PATCH 4/8] KVM: Introduce kvm_unmap_hva_range() for kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start() Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-07-02 8:57 ` [PATCH 5/8] KVM: Separate rmap_pde from kvm_lpage_info->write_count Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-07-02 8:57 ` [PATCH 6/8] KVM: MMU: Add memslot parameter to hva handlers Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-07-02 8:58 ` [PATCH 7/8] KVM: MMU: Push trace_kvm_age_page() into kvm_age_rmapp() Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-07-02 8:59 ` [PATCH 8/8] KVM: MMU: Avoid handling same rmap_pde in kvm_handle_hva_range() Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-07-02 9:10 ` [PATCH 0/8] KVM: Optimize MMU notifier's THP page invalidation -v4 Avi Kivity
2012-07-05 13:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-07-17 14:06 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-07-18 19:56 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120718195628.GA18071@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com \
--cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).