From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86 emulator: access GPRs on demand
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:23:01 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120807212301.GA6689@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1342700078-23534-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 03:14:38PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Instead of populating the the entire register file, read in registers
> as they are accessed, and write back only the modified ones. This
> saves a VMREAD and VMWRITE on Intel (for rsp, since it is not usually
> used during emulation), and a two 128-byte copies for the registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 17 ++-
> arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 268 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 50 ++++---
> 3 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 143 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index c764f43..2f1da16 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -86,6 +86,19 @@ struct x86_instruction_info {
>
> struct x86_emulate_ops {
> /*
> + * read_gpr: read a general purpose register (rax - r15)
> + *
> + * @reg: gpr number.
> + */
> + ulong (*read_gpr)(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned reg);
> + /*
> + * write_gpr: write a general purpose register (rax - r15)
> + *
> + * @reg: gpr number.
> + * @val: value to write.
> + */
> + void (*write_gpr)(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned reg, ulong val);
> + /*
> * read_std: Read bytes of standard (non-emulated/special) memory.
> * Used for descriptor reading.
> * @addr: [IN ] Linear address from which to read.
> @@ -281,8 +294,10 @@ struct x86_emulate_ctxt {
> bool rip_relative;
> unsigned long _eip;
> struct operand memop;
> + u32 regs_valid; /* bitmaps of registers in _regs[] that can be read */
> + u32 regs_dirty; /* bitmaps of registers in _regs[] that have been written */
emul_regs_dirty (to avoid with the other regs_dirty).
> /* Fields above regs are cleared together. */
> - unsigned long regs[NR_VCPU_REGS];
> + unsigned long _regs[NR_VCPU_REGS];
> struct operand *memopp;
> struct fetch_cache fetch;
> struct read_cache io_read;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> index 97d9a99..468d26e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -202,6 +202,28 @@ struct gprefix {
> #define EFLG_RESERVED_ZEROS_MASK 0xffc0802a
> #define EFLG_RESERVED_ONE_MASK 2
>
> +static ulong reg_read(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned nr)
> +{
> + if (!(ctxt->regs_valid & (1 << nr))) {
> + ctxt->regs_valid |= 1 << nr;
> + ctxt->_regs[nr] = ctxt->ops->read_gpr(ctxt, nr);
> + }
> + return ctxt->_regs[nr];
> +}
> +
> +static ulong *reg_write(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned nr)
> +{
> + ctxt->regs_valid |= 1 << nr;
> + ctxt->regs_dirty |= 1 << nr;
> + return &ctxt->_regs[nr];
> +}
> +
> +static ulong *reg_rmw(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned nr)
> +{
> + reg_read(ctxt, nr);
> + return reg_write(ctxt, nr);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Instruction emulation:
> * Most instructions are emulated directly via a fragment of inline assembly
> @@ -374,8 +396,8 @@ struct gprefix {
> #define __emulate_1op_rax_rdx(ctxt, _op, _suffix, _ex) \
> do { \
> unsigned long _tmp; \
> - ulong *rax = &(ctxt)->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX]; \
> - ulong *rdx = &(ctxt)->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX]; \
> + ulong *rax = reg_rmw((ctxt), VCPU_REGS_RAX); \
> + ulong *rdx = reg_rmw((ctxt), VCPU_REGS_RDX); \
> \
> __asm__ __volatile__ ( \
> _PRE_EFLAGS("0", "5", "1") \
> @@ -773,14 +795,15 @@ static int do_insn_fetch(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> * pointer into the block that addresses the relevant register.
> * @highbyte_regs specifies whether to decode AH,CH,DH,BH.
> */
> -static void *decode_register(u8 modrm_reg, unsigned long *regs,
> +static void *decode_register(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, u8 modrm_reg,
> int highbyte_regs)
> {
> void *p;
>
> - p = ®s[modrm_reg];
> if (highbyte_regs && modrm_reg >= 4 && modrm_reg < 8)
> - p = (unsigned char *)®s[modrm_reg & 3] + 1;
> + p = (unsigned char *)reg_rmw(ctxt, modrm_reg & 3) + 1;
> + else
> + p = reg_rmw(ctxt, modrm_reg);
> return p;
> }
>
> @@ -969,10 +992,10 @@ static void decode_register_operand(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
>
> op->type = OP_REG;
> if (ctxt->d & ByteOp) {
> - op->addr.reg = decode_register(reg, ctxt->regs, highbyte_regs);
> + op->addr.reg = decode_register(ctxt, reg, highbyte_regs);
> op->bytes = 1;
> } else {
> - op->addr.reg = decode_register(reg, ctxt->regs, 0);
> + op->addr.reg = decode_register(ctxt, reg, 0);
> op->bytes = ctxt->op_bytes;
> }
> fetch_register_operand(op);
> @@ -1007,8 +1030,7 @@ static int decode_modrm(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> if (ctxt->modrm_mod == 3) {
> op->type = OP_REG;
> op->bytes = (ctxt->d & ByteOp) ? 1 : ctxt->op_bytes;
> - op->addr.reg = decode_register(ctxt->modrm_rm,
> - ctxt->regs, ctxt->d & ByteOp);
> + op->addr.reg = decode_register(ctxt, ctxt->modrm_rm, ctxt->d & ByteOp);
> if (ctxt->d & Sse) {
> op->type = OP_XMM;
> op->bytes = 16;
> @@ -1029,10 +1051,10 @@ static int decode_modrm(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> op->type = OP_MEM;
>
> if (ctxt->ad_bytes == 2) {
> - unsigned bx = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RBX];
> - unsigned bp = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RBP];
> - unsigned si = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSI];
> - unsigned di = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDI];
> + unsigned bx = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBX);
> + unsigned bp = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBP);
> + unsigned si = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSI);
> + unsigned di = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDI);
>
> /* 16-bit ModR/M decode. */
> switch (ctxt->modrm_mod) {
> @@ -1089,17 +1111,17 @@ static int decode_modrm(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> if ((base_reg & 7) == 5 && ctxt->modrm_mod == 0)
> modrm_ea += insn_fetch(s32, ctxt);
> else {
> - modrm_ea += ctxt->regs[base_reg];
> + modrm_ea += reg_read(ctxt, base_reg);
> adjust_modrm_seg(ctxt, base_reg);
> }
> if (index_reg != 4)
> - modrm_ea += ctxt->regs[index_reg] << scale;
> + modrm_ea += reg_read(ctxt, index_reg) << scale;
> } else if ((ctxt->modrm_rm & 7) == 5 && ctxt->modrm_mod == 0) {
> if (ctxt->mode == X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64)
> ctxt->rip_relative = 1;
> } else {
> base_reg = ctxt->modrm_rm;
> - modrm_ea += ctxt->regs[base_reg];
> + modrm_ea += reg_read(ctxt, base_reg);
> adjust_modrm_seg(ctxt, base_reg);
> }
> switch (ctxt->modrm_mod) {
> @@ -1240,10 +1262,10 @@ static int pio_in_emulated(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> if (rc->pos == rc->end) { /* refill pio read ahead */
> unsigned int in_page, n;
> unsigned int count = ctxt->rep_prefix ?
> - address_mask(ctxt, ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX]) : 1;
> + address_mask(ctxt, reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX)) : 1;
> in_page = (ctxt->eflags & EFLG_DF) ?
> - offset_in_page(ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDI]) :
> - PAGE_SIZE - offset_in_page(ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDI]);
> + offset_in_page(reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDI)) :
> + PAGE_SIZE - offset_in_page(reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDI));
> n = min(min(in_page, (unsigned int)sizeof(rc->data)) / size,
> count);
> if (n == 0)
> @@ -1522,8 +1544,8 @@ static int push(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void *data, int bytes)
> {
> struct segmented_address addr;
>
> - register_address_increment(ctxt, &ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP], -bytes);
> - addr.ea = register_address(ctxt, ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP]);
> + register_address_increment(ctxt, reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP), -bytes);
> + addr.ea = register_address(ctxt, reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP));
> addr.seg = VCPU_SREG_SS;
>
> return segmented_write(ctxt, addr, data, bytes);
> @@ -1542,13 +1564,13 @@ static int emulate_pop(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> int rc;
> struct segmented_address addr;
>
> - addr.ea = register_address(ctxt, ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP]);
> + addr.ea = register_address(ctxt, reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP));
> addr.seg = VCPU_SREG_SS;
> rc = segmented_read(ctxt, addr, dest, len);
> if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
> return rc;
>
> - register_address_increment(ctxt, &ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP], len);
> + register_address_increment(ctxt, reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP), len);
> return rc;
> }
>
> @@ -1610,26 +1632,28 @@ static int em_enter(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> int rc;
> unsigned frame_size = ctxt->src.val;
> unsigned nesting_level = ctxt->src2.val & 31;
> + ulong rbp;
>
> if (nesting_level)
> return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
>
> - rc = push(ctxt, &ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RBP], stack_size(ctxt));
> + rbp = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBP);
> + rc = push(ctxt, &rbp, stack_size(ctxt));
> if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
> return rc;
> - assign_masked(&ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RBP], ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP],
> + assign_masked(reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBP), reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP),
> stack_mask(ctxt));
> - assign_masked(&ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP],
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP] - frame_size,
> + assign_masked(reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP),
> + reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP) - frame_size,
> stack_mask(ctxt));
> return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
> }
>
> static int em_leave(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> - assign_masked(&ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP], ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RBP],
> + assign_masked(reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP), reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBP),
> stack_mask(ctxt));
> - return emulate_pop(ctxt, &ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RBP], ctxt->op_bytes);
> + return emulate_pop(ctxt, reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBP), ctxt->op_bytes);
> }
>
> static int em_push_sreg(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> @@ -1657,13 +1681,13 @@ static int em_pop_sreg(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>
> static int em_pusha(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> - unsigned long old_esp = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP];
> + unsigned long old_esp = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP);
> int rc = X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
> int reg = VCPU_REGS_RAX;
>
> while (reg <= VCPU_REGS_RDI) {
> (reg == VCPU_REGS_RSP) ?
> - (ctxt->src.val = old_esp) : (ctxt->src.val = ctxt->regs[reg]);
> + (ctxt->src.val = old_esp) : (ctxt->src.val = reg_read(ctxt, reg));
>
> rc = em_push(ctxt);
> if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
> @@ -1688,12 +1712,12 @@ static int em_popa(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>
> while (reg >= VCPU_REGS_RAX) {
> if (reg == VCPU_REGS_RSP) {
> - register_address_increment(ctxt, &ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP],
> + register_address_increment(ctxt, reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP),
> ctxt->op_bytes);
> --reg;
> }
>
> - rc = emulate_pop(ctxt, &ctxt->regs[reg], ctxt->op_bytes);
> + rc = emulate_pop(ctxt, reg_rmw(ctxt, reg), ctxt->op_bytes);
> if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
> break;
> --reg;
> @@ -1961,14 +1985,14 @@ static int em_cmpxchg8b(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> u64 old = ctxt->dst.orig_val64;
>
> - if (((u32) (old >> 0) != (u32) ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX]) ||
> - ((u32) (old >> 32) != (u32) ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX])) {
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX] = (u32) (old >> 0);
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX] = (u32) (old >> 32);
> + if (((u32) (old >> 0) != (u32) reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX)) ||
> + ((u32) (old >> 32) != (u32) reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDX))) {
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX) = (u32) (old >> 0);
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDX) = (u32) (old >> 32);
> ctxt->eflags &= ~EFLG_ZF;
> } else {
> - ctxt->dst.val64 = ((u64)ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX] << 32) |
> - (u32) ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RBX];
> + ctxt->dst.val64 = ((u64)reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX) << 32) |
> + (u32) reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBX);
>
> ctxt->eflags |= EFLG_ZF;
> }
> @@ -2004,7 +2028,7 @@ static int em_cmpxchg(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> /* Save real source value, then compare EAX against destination. */
> ctxt->src.orig_val = ctxt->src.val;
> - ctxt->src.val = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX];
> + ctxt->src.val = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
> emulate_2op_SrcV(ctxt, "cmp");
>
> if (ctxt->eflags & EFLG_ZF) {
> @@ -2013,7 +2037,7 @@ static int em_cmpxchg(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> } else {
> /* Failure: write the value we saw to EAX. */
> ctxt->dst.type = OP_REG;
> - ctxt->dst.addr.reg = (unsigned long *)&ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX];
> + ctxt->dst.addr.reg = reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
> }
> return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
> }
> @@ -2153,10 +2177,10 @@ static int em_syscall(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> ops->set_segment(ctxt, cs_sel, &cs, 0, VCPU_SREG_CS);
> ops->set_segment(ctxt, ss_sel, &ss, 0, VCPU_SREG_SS);
>
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX] = ctxt->_eip;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX) = ctxt->_eip;
> if (efer & EFER_LMA) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_R11] = ctxt->eflags & ~EFLG_RF;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_R11) = ctxt->eflags & ~EFLG_RF;
>
> ops->get_msr(ctxt,
> ctxt->mode == X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64 ?
> @@ -2235,7 +2259,7 @@ static int em_sysenter(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> ctxt->_eip = msr_data;
>
> ops->get_msr(ctxt, MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_ESP, &msr_data);
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP] = msr_data;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP) = msr_data;
>
> return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
> }
> @@ -2285,8 +2309,8 @@ static int em_sysexit(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> ops->set_segment(ctxt, cs_sel, &cs, 0, VCPU_SREG_CS);
> ops->set_segment(ctxt, ss_sel, &ss, 0, VCPU_SREG_SS);
>
> - ctxt->_eip = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX];
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP] = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX];
> + ctxt->_eip = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDX);
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP) = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
>
> return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
> }
> @@ -2355,14 +2379,14 @@ static void save_state_to_tss16(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> {
> tss->ip = ctxt->_eip;
> tss->flag = ctxt->eflags;
> - tss->ax = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX];
> - tss->cx = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX];
> - tss->dx = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX];
> - tss->bx = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RBX];
> - tss->sp = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP];
> - tss->bp = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RBP];
> - tss->si = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSI];
> - tss->di = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDI];
> + tss->ax = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
> + tss->cx = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
> + tss->dx = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDX);
> + tss->bx = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBX);
> + tss->sp = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP);
> + tss->bp = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBP);
> + tss->si = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSI);
> + tss->di = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDI);
>
> tss->es = get_segment_selector(ctxt, VCPU_SREG_ES);
> tss->cs = get_segment_selector(ctxt, VCPU_SREG_CS);
> @@ -2378,14 +2402,14 @@ static int load_state_from_tss16(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
>
> ctxt->_eip = tss->ip;
> ctxt->eflags = tss->flag | 2;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX] = tss->ax;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX] = tss->cx;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX] = tss->dx;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RBX] = tss->bx;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP] = tss->sp;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RBP] = tss->bp;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSI] = tss->si;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDI] = tss->di;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX) = tss->ax;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX) = tss->cx;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDX) = tss->dx;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBX) = tss->bx;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP) = tss->sp;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBP) = tss->bp;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSI) = tss->si;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDI) = tss->di;
>
> /*
> * SDM says that segment selectors are loaded before segment
> @@ -2470,14 +2494,14 @@ static void save_state_to_tss32(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> tss->cr3 = ctxt->ops->get_cr(ctxt, 3);
> tss->eip = ctxt->_eip;
> tss->eflags = ctxt->eflags;
> - tss->eax = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX];
> - tss->ecx = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX];
> - tss->edx = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX];
> - tss->ebx = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RBX];
> - tss->esp = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP];
> - tss->ebp = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RBP];
> - tss->esi = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSI];
> - tss->edi = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDI];
> + tss->eax = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
> + tss->ecx = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
> + tss->edx = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDX);
> + tss->ebx = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBX);
> + tss->esp = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP);
> + tss->ebp = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBP);
> + tss->esi = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSI);
> + tss->edi = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDI);
>
> tss->es = get_segment_selector(ctxt, VCPU_SREG_ES);
> tss->cs = get_segment_selector(ctxt, VCPU_SREG_CS);
> @@ -2499,14 +2523,14 @@ static int load_state_from_tss32(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> ctxt->eflags = tss->eflags | 2;
>
> /* General purpose registers */
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX] = tss->eax;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX] = tss->ecx;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX] = tss->edx;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RBX] = tss->ebx;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP] = tss->esp;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RBP] = tss->ebp;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSI] = tss->esi;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDI] = tss->edi;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX) = tss->eax;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX) = tss->ecx;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDX) = tss->edx;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBX) = tss->ebx;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP) = tss->esp;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBP) = tss->ebp;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSI) = tss->esi;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDI) = tss->edi;
>
> /*
> * SDM says that segment selectors are loaded before segment
> @@ -2738,8 +2762,8 @@ static void string_addr_inc(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned seg,
> {
> int df = (ctxt->eflags & EFLG_DF) ? -1 : 1;
>
> - register_address_increment(ctxt, &ctxt->regs[reg], df * op->bytes);
> - op->addr.mem.ea = register_address(ctxt, ctxt->regs[reg]);
> + register_address_increment(ctxt, reg_rmw(ctxt, reg), df * op->bytes);
> + op->addr.mem.ea = register_address(ctxt, reg_read(ctxt, reg));
> op->addr.mem.seg = seg;
> }
>
> @@ -2825,7 +2849,7 @@ static int em_ret_near_imm(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> rc = emulate_pop(ctxt, &ctxt->dst.val, ctxt->op_bytes);
> if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
> return rc;
> - register_address_increment(ctxt, &ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP], ctxt->src.val);
> + register_address_increment(ctxt, reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP), ctxt->src.val);
> return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
> }
>
> @@ -2915,7 +2939,7 @@ static int em_cwd(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> ctxt->dst.type = OP_REG;
> ctxt->dst.bytes = ctxt->src.bytes;
> - ctxt->dst.addr.reg = &ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX];
> + ctxt->dst.addr.reg = reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDX);
> ctxt->dst.val = ~((ctxt->src.val >> (ctxt->src.bytes * 8 - 1)) - 1);
>
> return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
> @@ -2926,8 +2950,8 @@ static int em_rdtsc(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> u64 tsc = 0;
>
> ctxt->ops->get_msr(ctxt, MSR_IA32_TSC, &tsc);
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX] = (u32)tsc;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX] = tsc >> 32;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX) = (u32)tsc;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDX) = tsc >> 32;
> return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
> }
>
> @@ -2935,10 +2959,10 @@ static int em_rdpmc(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> u64 pmc;
>
> - if (ctxt->ops->read_pmc(ctxt, ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX], &pmc))
> + if (ctxt->ops->read_pmc(ctxt, reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX), &pmc))
> return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0);
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX] = (u32)pmc;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX] = pmc >> 32;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX) = (u32)pmc;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDX) = pmc >> 32;
> return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
> }
>
> @@ -2980,9 +3004,9 @@ static int em_wrmsr(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> u64 msr_data;
>
> - msr_data = (u32)ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX]
> - | ((u64)ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX] << 32);
> - if (ctxt->ops->set_msr(ctxt, ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX], msr_data))
> + msr_data = (u32)reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX)
> + | ((u64)reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDX) << 32);
> + if (ctxt->ops->set_msr(ctxt, reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX), msr_data))
> return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0);
>
> return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
> @@ -2992,11 +3016,11 @@ static int em_rdmsr(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> u64 msr_data;
>
> - if (ctxt->ops->get_msr(ctxt, ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX], &msr_data))
> + if (ctxt->ops->get_msr(ctxt, reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX), &msr_data))
> return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0);
>
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX] = (u32)msr_data;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX] = msr_data >> 32;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX) = (u32)msr_data;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDX) = msr_data >> 32;
> return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
> }
>
> @@ -3176,8 +3200,8 @@ static int em_lmsw(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>
> static int em_loop(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> - register_address_increment(ctxt, &ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX], -1);
> - if ((address_mask(ctxt, ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX]) != 0) &&
> + register_address_increment(ctxt, reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX), -1);
> + if ((address_mask(ctxt, reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX) != 0)) &&
> (ctxt->b == 0xe2 || test_cc(ctxt->b ^ 0x5, ctxt->eflags)))
> jmp_rel(ctxt, ctxt->src.val);
>
> @@ -3186,7 +3210,7 @@ static int em_loop(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>
> static int em_jcxz(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> - if (address_mask(ctxt, ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX]) == 0)
> + if (address_mask(ctxt, reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX) == 0))
> jmp_rel(ctxt, ctxt->src.val);
>
> return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
> @@ -3274,20 +3298,20 @@ static int em_cpuid(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
>
> - eax = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX];
> - ecx = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX];
> + eax = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
> + ecx = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
> ctxt->ops->get_cpuid(ctxt, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX] = eax;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RBX] = ebx;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX] = ecx;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX] = edx;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX) = eax;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBX) = ebx;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX) = ecx;
> + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDX) = edx;
> return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
> }
>
> static int em_lahf(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX] &= ~0xff00UL;
> - ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX] |= (ctxt->eflags & 0xff) << 8;
> + *reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX) &= ~0xff00UL;
> + *reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX) |= (ctxt->eflags & 0xff) << 8;
> return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
> }
>
> @@ -3444,7 +3468,7 @@ static int check_svme(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>
> static int check_svme_pa(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> - u64 rax = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX];
> + u64 rax = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
>
> /* Valid physical address? */
> if (rax & 0xffff000000000000ULL)
> @@ -3466,7 +3490,7 @@ static int check_rdtsc(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> static int check_rdpmc(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> u64 cr4 = ctxt->ops->get_cr(ctxt, 4);
> - u64 rcx = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX];
> + u64 rcx = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
>
> if ((!(cr4 & X86_CR4_PCE) && ctxt->ops->cpl(ctxt)) ||
> (rcx > 3))
> @@ -3924,7 +3948,7 @@ static int decode_operand(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, struct operand *op,
> case OpAcc:
> op->type = OP_REG;
> op->bytes = (ctxt->d & ByteOp) ? 1 : ctxt->op_bytes;
> - op->addr.reg = &ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX];
> + op->addr.reg = reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
> fetch_register_operand(op);
> op->orig_val = op->val;
> break;
> @@ -3932,19 +3956,19 @@ static int decode_operand(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, struct operand *op,
> op->type = OP_MEM;
> op->bytes = (ctxt->d & ByteOp) ? 1 : ctxt->op_bytes;
> op->addr.mem.ea =
> - register_address(ctxt, ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDI]);
> + register_address(ctxt, reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDI));
> op->addr.mem.seg = VCPU_SREG_ES;
> op->val = 0;
> break;
> case OpDX:
> op->type = OP_REG;
> op->bytes = 2;
> - op->addr.reg = &ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX];
> + op->addr.reg = reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDX);
> fetch_register_operand(op);
> break;
> case OpCL:
> op->bytes = 1;
> - op->val = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX] & 0xff;
> + op->val = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX) & 0xff;
> break;
> case OpImmByte:
> rc = decode_imm(ctxt, op, 1, true);
> @@ -3975,7 +3999,7 @@ static int decode_operand(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, struct operand *op,
> op->type = OP_MEM;
> op->bytes = (ctxt->d & ByteOp) ? 1 : ctxt->op_bytes;
> op->addr.mem.ea =
> - register_address(ctxt, ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSI]);
> + register_address(ctxt, reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSI));
> op->addr.mem.seg = seg_override(ctxt);
> op->val = 0;
> break;
> @@ -4281,6 +4305,14 @@ static void fetch_possible_mmx_operand(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> read_mmx_reg(ctxt, &op->mm_val, op->addr.mm);
> }
>
> +static void writeback_registers(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> +{
> + unsigned reg;
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(reg, (ulong *)&ctxt->regs_dirty, 16)
> + ctxt->ops->write_gpr(ctxt, reg, ctxt->_regs[reg]);
> +}
> +
> int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> struct x86_emulate_ops *ops = ctxt->ops;
> @@ -4365,7 +4397,7 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>
> if (ctxt->rep_prefix && (ctxt->d & String)) {
> /* All REP prefixes have the same first termination condition */
> - if (address_mask(ctxt, ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX]) == 0) {
> + if (address_mask(ctxt, reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX)) == 0) {
> ctxt->eip = ctxt->_eip;
> goto done;
> }
> @@ -4438,7 +4470,7 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> ctxt->dst.val = ctxt->src.addr.mem.ea;
> break;
> case 0x90 ... 0x97: /* nop / xchg reg, rax */
> - if (ctxt->dst.addr.reg == &ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX])
> + if (ctxt->dst.addr.reg == reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX))
> break;
> rc = em_xchg(ctxt);
> break;
> @@ -4466,7 +4498,7 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> rc = em_grp2(ctxt);
> break;
> case 0xd2 ... 0xd3: /* Grp2 */
> - ctxt->src.val = ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX];
> + ctxt->src.val = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
> rc = em_grp2(ctxt);
> break;
> case 0xe9: /* jmp rel */
> @@ -4521,14 +4553,14 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>
> if (ctxt->rep_prefix && (ctxt->d & String)) {
> struct read_cache *r = &ctxt->io_read;
> - register_address_increment(ctxt, &ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX], -1);
> + register_address_increment(ctxt, reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX), -1);
>
> if (!string_insn_completed(ctxt)) {
> /*
> * Re-enter guest when pio read ahead buffer is empty
> * or, if it is not used, after each 1024 iteration.
> */
> - if ((r->end != 0 || ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX] & 0x3ff) &&
> + if ((r->end != 0 || reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX) & 0x3ff) &&
> (r->end == 0 || r->end != r->pos)) {
> /*
> * Reset read cache. Usually happens before
> @@ -4536,6 +4568,7 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> * we have to do it here.
> */
> ctxt->mem_read.end = 0;
> + writeback_registers(ctxt);
> return EMULATION_RESTART;
> }
> goto done; /* skip rip writeback */
> @@ -4550,6 +4583,9 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> if (rc == X86EMUL_INTERCEPTED)
> return EMULATION_INTERCEPTED;
>
> + if (rc == X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
> + writeback_registers(ctxt);
> +
Why can't this be in the writeback function in this file (named
internal_writeback_registers or something)? Less cases to consider (eg
why its safe to skip writeback on X86EMUL_INTERCEPTED again).
> return (rc == X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE) ? EMULATION_FAILED : EMULATION_OK;
>
> twobyte_insn:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 59b5950..b8a8982 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -4325,7 +4325,19 @@ static void emulator_get_cpuid(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> kvm_cpuid(emul_to_vcpu(ctxt), eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> }
>
> +static ulong emulator_read_gpr(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned reg)
> +{
> + return kvm_register_read(emul_to_vcpu(ctxt), reg);
> +}
> +
> +static void emulator_write_gpr(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned reg, ulong val)
> +{
> + kvm_register_write(emul_to_vcpu(ctxt), reg, val);
> +}
> +
> static struct x86_emulate_ops emulate_ops = {
> + .read_gpr = emulator_read_gpr,
> + .write_gpr = emulator_write_gpr,
> .read_std = kvm_read_guest_virt_system,
> .write_std = kvm_write_guest_virt_system,
> .fetch = kvm_fetch_guest_virt,
> @@ -4360,14 +4372,6 @@ static void emulator_get_cpuid(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> .get_cpuid = emulator_get_cpuid,
> };
>
> -static void cache_all_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
> - kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RSP);
> - kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RIP);
> - vcpu->arch.regs_dirty = ~0;
> -}
> -
> static void toggle_interruptibility(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 mask)
> {
> u32 int_shadow = kvm_x86_ops->get_interrupt_shadow(vcpu, mask);
> @@ -4394,12 +4398,10 @@ static void inject_emulated_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, ctxt->exception.vector);
> }
>
> -static void init_decode_cache(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> - const unsigned long *regs)
> +static void init_decode_cache(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> memset(&ctxt->twobyte, 0,
> - (void *)&ctxt->regs - (void *)&ctxt->twobyte);
> - memcpy(ctxt->regs, regs, sizeof(ctxt->regs));
> + (void *)&ctxt->_regs - (void *)&ctxt->twobyte);
>
> ctxt->fetch.start = 0;
> ctxt->fetch.end = 0;
> @@ -4414,14 +4416,6 @@ static void init_emulate_ctxt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt = &vcpu->arch.emulate_ctxt;
> int cs_db, cs_l;
>
> - /*
> - * TODO: fix emulate.c to use guest_read/write_register
> - * instead of direct ->regs accesses, can save hundred cycles
> - * on Intel for instructions that don't read/change RSP, for
> - * for example.
> - */
> - cache_all_regs(vcpu);
> -
> kvm_x86_ops->get_cs_db_l_bits(vcpu, &cs_db, &cs_l);
>
> ctxt->eflags = kvm_get_rflags(vcpu);
> @@ -4433,7 +4427,7 @@ static void init_emulate_ctxt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> X86EMUL_MODE_PROT16;
> ctxt->guest_mode = is_guest_mode(vcpu);
>
> - init_decode_cache(ctxt, vcpu->arch.regs);
> + init_decode_cache(ctxt);
> vcpu->arch.emulate_regs_need_sync_from_vcpu = false;
> }
>
> @@ -4453,7 +4447,6 @@ int kvm_inject_realmode_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq, int inc_eip)
> return EMULATE_FAIL;
>
> ctxt->eip = ctxt->_eip;
> - memcpy(vcpu->arch.regs, ctxt->regs, sizeof ctxt->regs);
> kvm_rip_write(vcpu, ctxt->eip);
> kvm_set_rflags(vcpu, ctxt->eflags);
Need to writeback here?
> @@ -4601,7 +4594,7 @@ int x86_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> changes registers values during IO operation */
> if (vcpu->arch.emulate_regs_need_sync_from_vcpu) {
> vcpu->arch.emulate_regs_need_sync_from_vcpu = false;
> - memcpy(ctxt->regs, vcpu->arch.regs, sizeof ctxt->regs);
> + ctxt->regs_valid = 0;
> }
I think you can improve this hack now (perhaps invalidate the emulator
cache on SET_REGS?).
> restart:
> @@ -4639,7 +4632,6 @@ int x86_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> toggle_interruptibility(vcpu, ctxt->interruptibility);
> kvm_set_rflags(vcpu, ctxt->eflags);
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
> - memcpy(vcpu->arch.regs, ctxt->regs, sizeof ctxt->regs);
> vcpu->arch.emulate_regs_need_sync_to_vcpu = false;
> kvm_rip_write(vcpu, ctxt->eip);
> } else
> @@ -5593,7 +5585,11 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_regs *regs)
> * backdoor interface) need this to work
> */
> struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt = &vcpu->arch.emulate_ctxt;
> - memcpy(vcpu->arch.regs, ctxt->regs, sizeof ctxt->regs);
> + unsigned reg;
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(reg, (ulong *)&ctxt->regs_dirty, 16)
> + kvm_register_write(vcpu, reg, ctxt->_regs[reg]);
> +
Same as comment below.
> vcpu->arch.emulate_regs_need_sync_to_vcpu = false;
> }
> regs->rax = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
> @@ -5724,6 +5720,7 @@ int kvm_task_switch(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 tss_selector, int idt_index,
> {
> struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt = &vcpu->arch.emulate_ctxt;
> int ret;
> + unsigned reg;
>
> init_emulate_ctxt(vcpu);
>
> @@ -5733,7 +5730,8 @@ int kvm_task_switch(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 tss_selector, int idt_index,
> if (ret)
> return EMULATE_FAIL;
>
> - memcpy(vcpu->arch.regs, ctxt->regs, sizeof ctxt->regs);
> + for_each_set_bit(reg, (ulong *)&ctxt->regs_dirty, 16)
> + kvm_register_write(vcpu, reg, ctxt->_regs[reg]);
Should update regs_avail/regs_dirty? Better to do any of that in
emulator.c via interfaces.
> kvm_rip_write(vcpu, ctxt->eip);
> kvm_set_rflags(vcpu, ctxt->eflags);
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
> --
> 1.7.11.2
Did not double check that emulator.c convertion is complete with your
patch (which should be done).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-07 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-19 12:14 [PATCH] KVM: x86 emulator: access GPRs on demand Avi Kivity
2012-08-07 21:23 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2012-08-07 21:24 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-08 12:38 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120807212301.GA6689@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).