From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] s390/kvm: Handle hosts not supporting s390-virtio. Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:45:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20120810094500.0211c349@BR9GNB5Z> References: <1344351168-2568-1-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> <1344351168-2568-2-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> <1DF99033-5FD5-40ED-9221-61E7EA5A9219@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: KVM , linux-s390 , qemu-devel , Avi Kivity , Marcelo Tosatti , Anthony Liguori , Rusty Russell , Christian Borntraeger , Carsten Otte , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , Sebastian Ott To: Alexander Graf Return-path: Received: from e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.109]:39450 "EHLO e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754908Ab2HJHpL (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2012 03:45:11 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:45:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1DF99033-5FD5-40ED-9221-61E7EA5A9219@suse.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 01:09:15 +0200 Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 07.08.2012, at 16:52, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > Running under a kvm host does not necessarily imply the presence of > > a page mapped above the main memory with the virtio information; > > however, the code includes a hard coded access to that page. > > > > Instead, check for the presence of the page and exit gracefully > > before we hit an addressing exception if it does not exist. > > > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck > > --- > > drivers/s390/kvm/kvm_virtio.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/s390/kvm/kvm_virtio.c b/drivers/s390/kvm/kvm_virtio.c > > index 47cccd5..408447c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/s390/kvm/kvm_virtio.c > > +++ b/drivers/s390/kvm/kvm_virtio.c > > @@ -418,6 +418,21 @@ static void kvm_extint_handler(struct ext_code ext_code, > > } > > } > > > > +static int __init test_devices_support(void) > > Today we know what this function does, but the next person running into it has no clue. Maybe add a nice description here that you're trying to access memory above ram? (is this even what you're doing here? my s390 asm is slightly rusty) :) Good point, will add a comment.