From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] irq destination caching prototype Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:43:13 +0300 Message-ID: <20120813114313.GB3341@redhat.com> References: <5028D52D.9050104@redhat.com> <20120813102402.GT3341@redhat.com> <5028D788.3070006@redhat.com> <20120813103845.GA16300@redhat.com> <5028DDCD.1090205@redhat.com> <20120813110108.GX3341@redhat.com> <5028DF17.2050008@redhat.com> <20120813111241.GY3341@redhat.com> <20120813112214.GB16801@redhat.com> <20120813112931.GZ3341@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avi Kivity , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kiszka To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4818 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751338Ab2HMLnP (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2012 07:43:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120813112931.GZ3341@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 02:29:31PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 02:22:14PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 02:12:41PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 02:03:51PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > > > > On 08/13/2012 02:01 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> Actually this is overkill. Suppose we do an apicid->vcpu translation > > > > >> cache? Then we retain O(1) behaviour, no need for a huge cache. > > > > >> > > > > > Not sure I follow. > > > > > > > > Unicast MSIs and IPIs can be speeded up by looking up the vcpu using the > > > > apic id, using a static lookup table (only changed when the guest > > > > updates apicid or a vcpu is inserted). > > > > > > > To check that MSI/IPI is unicast you need to check a lot of things: delivery > > > mode, shorthand, dest mode, vector. In short everything but level. This > > > is exactly what kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic() is doing. Caching apicid->vcpu > > > is not enough, caching (delivery mode, shorthand, dest mode, > > > vector)->vcpu is enough and this is exactly what the patch does for irq > > > routing entries. > > > > At least for MSI I think it is simple. Here's the relevant code from > > my old patch: > > > > +static bool kvm_msi_is_multicast(unsigned dest, int dest_mode) > > +{ > > + if (dest_mode == 0) > > + /* Physical mode. */ > > + return dest == 0xff; > > + else > > + /* Logical mode. */ > > + return dest & (dest - 1); > > +} > > > MSI does not have shorthand, so it is simpler but the code above does > work for APIC_DFR_CLUSTER as far as I can tell and it does not check > lowest prio, which is not multicast, but should bot be cached. > It also a little bit pessimistic for logical mode. Dest may have more than one bit set, but be delivered to only one cpu. -- Gleb.