From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv4 3/4] cpuid: disable pv eoi for 1.1 and older compat types Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:03:34 -0300 Message-ID: <20120829100334.GB561@amt.cnet> References: <20120828191338.GE6223@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> <20120828213527.GB5817@redhat.com> <20120828220242.GW2886@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> <20120828222113.GA5970@redhat.com> <20120829095903.GB32031@amt.cnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eduardo Habkost , Anthony Liguori , avi@redhat.com, gleb@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kiszka , Blue Swirl To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:2910 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751928Ab2H2KDm (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 06:03:42 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120829095903.GB32031@amt.cnet> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 06:59:03AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > I don't understand. What is the problem with the proposal? > > What will not work with our protocol? > > Can you give an example please? > > > > > > > > Too late for 1.2? > > > > > > Absolutely (in my opinion). > > My concern here is that you are introducing infrastructure by using > _one example_, claiming it to solve a general problem, without the > appropriate amount of energy spent in this solution. > > Using old machines is supposed to be supported on older guests. > > Michael, not migrating the PVEOI MSR actually crashes the guest? Which is irrelevant since it won't be able to migrate to an older qemu.