From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] kvm: level irqfd support Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:52:43 +0300 Message-ID: <20120905145243.GB11048@redhat.com> References: <20120821190800.24958.74812.stgit@bling.home> <504764DE.5080202@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alex Williamson , gleb@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <504764DE.5080202@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:42:38PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 08/21/2012 10:28 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > > Here's the much anticipated re-write of support for level irqfds. As > > Michael suggested, I've rolled the eoi/ack notification fd into > > KVM_IRQFD as a new mode. For lack of a better name, as there seems to > > be objections to associating this specifically with an EOI or an ACK, > > I've name this OADN or "On Ack, De-assert & Notify". > > Perhaps we can call it "resample", since this is what it is doing. > irqfd tells kvm that the line as been asserted, resample tells the > caller to check again. Sounds good. > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function