From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: Don Slutz <Don@cloudswitch.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, imammedo@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] target-i386: Fix default Hypervisor level for hypervisor-vendor=kvm.
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:49:20 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120921204920.GD3983@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <505CCD92.5080300@CloudSwitch.Com>
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 04:26:58PM -0400, Don Slutz wrote:
> On 09/21/12 10:18, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 04:06:27PM -0400, Don Slutz wrote:
> >> From http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1205.0/00100.html
> >>EAX should be KVM_CPUID_FEATURES (0x40000001) not 0.
> >>
> >>Added hypervisor-vendor=kvm0 to get the older CPUID result. kvm1 selects the newer one.
> >Why not just make "hypervisor-vendor=kvm" control only the hypervisor
> >vendor string, and support something like "kvm-hypervisor-level=0" to
> >restore the old cpuid_hv_level=0 behavior?
> -cpu host,hypervisor-vendor=kvm,hypervisor-level=0
>
> Does this.
Good. :-)
> >
> >This is similar to the kvmclock case: it would allow us to make
> >"hypervisor-vendor=kvm" use saner values as default, but letting old
> >machine-types to override it for compatibility if required.
> Right now since I am using env->cpuid_hv_level == 0 as a flag. This
> means that:
>
> -cpu host,hypervisor-level=0,hypervisor-vendor=kvm
>
> -cpu host,hypervisor-vendor=kvm,hypervisor-level=0
>
> end up with different CPUID data (Which I do not like). I will fix this in the next round.
Right. This has to be fixed.
>
> Did you want me to drop kvm0 and kvm1?
Yes, if level is already configurable using the hypervisor-level
property, I don't see the need for kvm0 and kvm1.
If you make kvm_arch_init_vcpu() actually use those fields, you will end
up implementing what's required to allow migration compatibility to be
kept (the only thing missing is to make the CPU class a child of
DeviceState, and add hypervisor-level=0 to the existing machine-types).
:-)
--
Eduardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-21 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-20 20:06 [PATCH v2 0/1] target-i386: Fix default Hypervisor level for kvm Don Slutz
2012-09-20 20:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] target-i386: Fix default Hypervisor level for hypervisor-vendor=kvm Don Slutz
2012-09-21 14:18 ` Eduardo Habkost
2012-09-21 20:26 ` Don Slutz
2012-09-21 20:49 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2012-09-21 21:28 ` Don Slutz
2012-09-21 21:53 ` Eduardo Habkost
2012-09-22 3:26 ` Don Slutz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120921204920.GD3983@otherpad.lan.raisama.net \
--to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=Don@cloudswitch.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox