From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Move kvm's instruction decoding into generic code.
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:27:58 +0100
Message-ID: <20121024162758.GB2005@linaro.org>
References: <20121022174555.GD26619@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
 <1351077923-17977-1-git-send-email-rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <c.dall@virtualopensystems.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:44940 "EHLO
	mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S933634Ab2JXQ2D (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:28:03 -0400
Received: by mail-bk0-f46.google.com with SMTP id jk13so354289bkc.19
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1351077923-17977-1-git-send-email-rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 09:55:13PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Compile-tested only, but shows what it looks like (ugly).
> 
> I just used the existing code and didn't crack open my ARM books to
> determine if there's a better way.  The struct names are pretty vague,
> too, as a result.
> 

Thanks (to you and Christoffer) for having a stab at this.

I'll try to respond to these patches, but I have a recorsive panic
going on here so it may take a bit of time...

Cheers
---Dave