From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] s390: Guest support for virtio-ccw.
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:04:52 +0100
Message-ID: <20121030140452.32dfa251@BR9GNB5Z>
References: <1351516046-30037-1-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
	<CE383E4A-4C23-4E8C-B237-EFD2F849D884@suse.de>
	<20121029191504.0d36a68a@BR9GNB5Z>
	<88DEC3C5-44B9-498D-9F7F-A0AFAB527235@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.106]:49820 "EHLO
	e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S932497Ab2J3NE6 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:04:58 -0400
Received: from /spool/local
	by e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org> from <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>;
	Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:04:57 -0000
In-Reply-To: <88DEC3C5-44B9-498D-9F7F-A0AFAB527235@suse.de>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:33:14 +0100
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote:

> 
> On 29.10.2012, at 19:15, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:55:21 +0100
> > Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote:
> > 
> >> 
> >> On 29.10.2012, at 14:07, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Avi, Marcelo,
> >>> 
> >>> I'd like to propose inclusion of the guest support patches for
> >>> virtio-ccw into 3.8.
> >>> 
> >>> I'm confident that the host <-> guest interface for virtio-ccw
> >>> is fine now, and the patches have been extensively tested by our
> >>> internal test team.
> >>> 
> >>> Patch 1 might conceivably be 3.7 material, though I fear it's a
> >>> bit late for that.
> >> 
> >> Well, patch 1 without virtio-ccw support is quite useless, right? You wouldn't get any I/O at all.
> > 
> > Yes, but it stops in an obvious way (no devices can be found) and
> > not with a strange backchain.
> 
> Hrm. Then it's probably best to actually CC stable as well :)

If there aren't any objections, I'll just respin with minor changes and
put in a cc:stable.