From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: [PULL 00/12] ppc patch queue 2012-10-30 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:28:00 -0200 Message-ID: <20121031112800.GB32510@amt.cnet> References: <1351591345-23071-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <20121031013255.GC21986@amt.cnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: KVM list , kvm-ppc , Avi Kivity To: Alexander Graf Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:61610 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422712Ab2JaL2E (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:28:04 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:22:55AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > On 31.10.2012, at 02:32, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:02:13AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> Hi Avi / Marcelo, > >> > >> This is my current patch queue for ppc. Please pull. > >> > >> Headline changes are: > >> > >> * Fix 440 target > >> * Fix uapi conflict > > > > Can you regenerate against queue branch? (btw i forgot to update fsl_hcalls.h...). > > Hrm. So which branch am I supposed to base against? Master, next or queue? This one is against next... > > Alex queue