From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@gmail.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] KVM: s390: Add support for machine checks.
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 10:44:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121219094414.GA4996@osiris.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354883425-38531-3-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 01:30:22PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> + rc = put_guest_u64(vcpu, __LC_MCCK_CODE, inti->mchk.mcic);
> + if (rc == -EFAULT)
> + exception = 1;
> +
> + rc = copy_to_guest(vcpu, __LC_MCK_OLD_PSW,
> + &vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw, sizeof(psw_t));
> + if (rc == -EFAULT)
> + exception = 1;
Please don't add more explicit -EFAULT checks on guest access paths. Just
make this like normal user space accesses. That is return code != 0 means
an error occured:
rc = put_guest_u64(vcpu, __LC_MCCK_CODE, inti->mchk.mcic);
if (rc)
exception = 1;
In fact, with the current kvm gaccess code it's even broken, since on error
the guest access functions may return also -ENOMEM instead of -EFAULT, which
would be ignored by your code.
I addressed that with a patch when trying to clean up the guest access
functions. Maybe the patch below should be merged anyway. Christian?
===================
>From db05454b6f3f49a7a10f5a1e546917303cf94532 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:36:23 +0200
Subject: s390/kvm,gaccess: fix guest access return code handling
Guest access functions like copy_to/from_guest() call __guestaddr_to_user()
which in turn call gmap_fault() in order to translate a guest address to a
user space address.
In error case __guest_addr_to_user() returns either -EFAULT or -ENOMEM.
The copy_to/from_guest functions just pass these return values down to the
callers.
The -ENOMEM case however is problematic since there are several places
which access guest memory like:
rc = copy_to_guest(...);
if (rc == -EFAULT)
error_handling();
So in case of -ENOMEM the code assumes that the guest memory access
succeeded even though it failed.
This can cause guest data or state corruption.
If __guestaddr_to_user() returns -ENOMEM the meaning is that a valid user
space mapping exists, but there was not enough memory available when trying
to build the guest mapping. In other words an out-of-memory situation
occured.
For normal user space accesses an out-of-memory situation causes the page
fault handler to map -ENOMEM to -EFAULT (see fixup code in do_no_context()).
We need to do exactly the same for the kvm gaccess functions.
So __guestaddr_to_user() should just map all error codes to -EFAULT.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
index 4703f12..84d01dd 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
@@ -22,13 +22,16 @@ static inline void __user *__guestaddr_to_user(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
unsigned long guestaddr)
{
unsigned long prefix = vcpu->arch.sie_block->prefix;
+ unsigned long uaddress;
if (guestaddr < 2 * PAGE_SIZE)
guestaddr += prefix;
else if ((guestaddr >= prefix) && (guestaddr < prefix + 2 * PAGE_SIZE))
guestaddr -= prefix;
-
- return (void __user *) gmap_fault(guestaddr, vcpu->arch.gmap);
+ uaddress = gmap_fault(guestaddr, vcpu->arch.gmap);
+ if (IS_ERR_VALUE(uaddress))
+ uaddress = -EFAULT;
+ return (void __user *)uaddress;
}
static inline int get_guest_u64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long guestaddr,
--
1.7.12.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-19 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-07 12:30 [PATCH v4 0/5] s390: Host support for channel I/O Cornelia Huck
2012-12-07 12:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: s390: Support for I/O interrupts Cornelia Huck
2012-12-10 7:33 ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-10 10:09 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-12-11 10:22 ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-11 12:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-12-12 0:36 ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-07 12:30 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: s390: Add support for machine checks Cornelia Huck
2012-12-10 7:51 ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-10 10:12 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-12-19 9:44 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2012-12-19 10:20 ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-12-19 13:07 ` Heiko Carstens
2012-12-07 12:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: s390: In-kernel handling of I/O instructions Cornelia Huck
2012-12-10 7:53 ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-10 10:14 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-12-07 12:30 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: s390: Base infrastructure for enabling capabilities Cornelia Huck
2012-12-10 7:54 ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-10 10:16 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-12-11 10:24 ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-07 12:30 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: s390: Add support for channel I/O instructions Cornelia Huck
2012-12-10 8:01 ` Alexander Graf
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-31 16:24 [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] s390: Host support for channel I/O Cornelia Huck
2012-10-31 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: s390: Add support for machine checks Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121219094414.GA4996@osiris.de.ibm.com \
--to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).