From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@gmail.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] KVM: x86 emulator: introduce NoWrite flag
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 17:39:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121222153934.GX29007@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEbWaipz3z=UOV7cNrnbd4PzFhZ6WWcKN-V8t7DP+Wxt9pFpKw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 05:28:00PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> #define X2(x...) x, x
> >> #define X3(x...) X2(x), x
> >> @@ -1584,6 +1585,9 @@ static int writeback(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> >> {
> >> int rc;
> >>
> >> + if (ctxt->d & NoWrite)
> >> + return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
> >> +
> > Why not make it Dst flag and set dst.type to OP_NONE during decoding
> > instead of this special case?
>
> My thinking was to eventually convert everything to NoWrite, then it's
> not a special case. But your approach works too, I can change it if
> you like. We'll have an if () either way though.
But meanwhile we will have two different ways to disable writeback. When
all instructions will be marked with NoWrite we can switch it easily if
we want. Also some instruction can disable writeback conditionally. cmov is one
(and may be only) of them.
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-22 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-22 12:26 [PATCH 0/7] Streamline arithmetic instruction emulation Avi Kivity
2012-12-22 12:26 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: x86 emulator: framework for streamlining arithmetic opcodes Avi Kivity
2012-12-22 17:00 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-12-22 17:42 ` Avi Kivity
2012-12-22 18:01 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-12-22 18:07 ` Avi Kivity
2012-12-22 18:11 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-12-22 18:18 ` Avi Kivity
2012-12-22 18:44 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-12-22 21:55 ` Avi Kivity
2012-12-22 12:26 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: x86 emulator: Support for declaring single operand fastops Avi Kivity
2012-12-22 12:26 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: x86 emulator: introduce NoWrite flag Avi Kivity
2012-12-22 15:11 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-12-22 15:28 ` Avi Kivity
2012-12-22 15:39 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2012-12-22 15:45 ` Avi Kivity
2012-12-22 15:51 ` Avi Kivity
2012-12-22 16:20 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-12-22 12:26 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: x86 emulator: mark CMP, CMPS, SCAS, TEST as NoWrite Avi Kivity
2012-12-22 12:26 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: x86 emulator: convert NOT, NEG to fastop Avi Kivity
2012-12-22 12:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: x86 emulator: add macros for defining 2-operand fastop emulation Avi Kivity
2012-12-22 12:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: x86 emulator: convert basic ALU ops to fastop Avi Kivity
2012-12-23 9:47 ` [PATCH 0/7] Streamline arithmetic instruction emulation Gleb Natapov
[not found] ` <CAEbWairRO+p1Lco8NJqC99xz1EFcP6CZktOsBmt6AwW4R5vMMw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-01-04 1:14 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121222153934.GX29007@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox