Re: [PATCH for-1.4 01/12] kvm: Add fake KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE_STABLE_BIT for builds withou KVM

[Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 05:59:14AM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 22.01.2013 02:43, schrieb Marcelo Tosatti:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 06:59:27PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
> >> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> >> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
> >> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  include/sysemu/kvm.h | 1 +
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> >> index 6bdd513..22acf91 100644
> >> --- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> >> +++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> >> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> >>  #define KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF     0
> >>  #define KVM_FEATURE_STEAL_TIME   0
> >>  #define KVM_FEATURE_PV_EOI       0
> >> +#define KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE_STABLE_BIT 0
> >>  #endif
> >>  
> >>  extern int kvm_allowed;
> >> -- 
> >> 1.7.11.7
> >>
> > 
> > ACK
> 
> BTW is it the general strategy to add these as needed for new patches?
> Or should we add all current ones and mandate adding such dummy
> definitions when new ones get introduced via linux-headers/ update?

Its a good idea to update the sync scripts to automatically create the
dummy ones, i suppose (there is no proactive strategy).