From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] KVM: MMU: simplify mmu_set_spte Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 22:21:51 -0200 Message-ID: <20130129002151.GB10814@amt.cnet> References: <50FFB5A1.5090708@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <50FFB5E9.2010500@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avi Kivity , Gleb Natapov , LKML , KVM To: Xiao Guangrong Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13142 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751451Ab3A2Arp (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 19:47:45 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50FFB5E9.2010500@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 06:05:29PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > In order to detecting spte remapping, we can simply check whether the > spte has already been pointing to the pfn even if the spte is not the > last spte, for middle spte is pointing to the kernel pfn which can not > be mapped to userspace This check is detecting spte overwrite, when a large spte is replaced by pointer to spte table. Can't see why check for different pfn is safe: only 'int level' can differ, and pfn be equivalent, for example.