From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] s390/kvm fixes Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:46:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20130129204600.GE627@redhat.com> References: <1359124457-51126-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <20130129131202.GC15004@redhat.com> <510833F1.2000200@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Marcelo Tossati , Alexander Graf , Jens Freimann , Cornelia Huck , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , KVM , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org To: Christian Borntraeger Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29144 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752167Ab3A2Uqt (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:46:49 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <510833F1.2000200@de.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:41:21PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 29/01/13 14:12, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:34:14PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > >> Gleb, Marcelo, > >> > > Alex, can you review? > > Last time I checked, Cornelia and myself were s390/kvm/kernel maintainers ;-) Sorry, by bad :) > Alex is maintainer for s390/kvm/qemu. > If the patch introduces or touched an kernel<->qemu interface, I usually try > to come to a conclusion with Alex before submission, but these patches are > only bugfixes and Alex is probably pretty busy working the last day before > qemus hard freeze for 1.4. > Got it. The question about 1/1. It is CCed to stable, does this mean you want it to go to 3.8? kvm-next is for 3.9. -- Gleb.