From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] s390/kvm fixes Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:30:17 +0200 Message-ID: <20130130103017.GG15004@redhat.com> References: <1359124457-51126-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <20130129131202.GC15004@redhat.com> <510833F1.2000200@de.ibm.com> <20130129204600.GE627@redhat.com> <20130129210329.GF627@redhat.com> <5108DF0C.3090907@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Marcelo Tossati , Alexander Graf , Jens Freimann , Cornelia Huck , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , KVM , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org To: Christian Borntraeger Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29402 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753805Ab3A3KbY (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2013 05:31:24 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5108DF0C.3090907@de.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:51:24AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 29/01/13 22:03, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > >> The question about 1/1. It is CCed to stable, does this mean you want it > >> to go to 3.8? kvm-next is for 3.9. > >> > > On the second thought, if it is not a regression 3.9 is the right place. > > The store status part is broken, but it only has a severe impact in case of > a machine check. (The machine check handler revalidates all registers with > the content of the save area). > Since machine checks are part of the virtio-ccw code, this can go into 3.9. > Feel free to remove the CC:stable. > No reason to drop stable, but 3.8 will have to get the fix through stable to after it is released. -- Gleb.