From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: KVM call minutes 2013-01-29 - Port I/O
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:49:19 +0200
Message-ID: <20130130224919.GA8820@redhat.com>
References: <871ud4gfoa.fsf@elfo.elfo> <5109065B.4060803@suse.de>
	<87vcae6ab6.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <1359579910.23274.31.camel@pasglop>
	<87a9rq5p0p.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <20130130222017.GE6544@redhat.com>
	<1359585125.23274.41.camel@pasglop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: KVM devel mailing list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Alon Levy <alevy@redhat.com>,
	qemu-ppc <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
	=?iso-8859-1?Q?Herv=E9?= Poussineau <hpoussin@reactos.org>,
	Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Return-path: <qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1359585125.23274.41.camel@pasglop>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org
Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:32:05AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 00:20 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > 
> > Well you can have a PCI bridge and a legacy device behind that.
> > I think real PCI express devices can not be mapped onto legacy address
> > ranges.
> 
> In practice they do (VGA at least)
> 
> >From a SW modelling standpoint, I don't think it's worth differentiating
> PCI and PCIE.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ben.

Interesting.
Do you have such hardware? Could you please dump
the output of lspci -vv?