From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: "KVM devel mailing list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Juan Quintela" <quintela@redhat.com>,
"Alexander Graf" <agraf@suse.de>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Alon Levy" <alevy@redhat.com>,
"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
"Anthony Liguori" <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
qemu-ppc <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>,
"David Gibson" <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
"Hervé Poussineau" <hpoussin@reactos.org>
Subject: Re: KVM call minutes 2013-01-29 - Port I/O
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 00:28:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130131222818.GB17928@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359667353.15464.5.camel@pasglop>
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 08:22:33AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 12:49 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> > OK but this appears behind a bridge. So the bridge configuration tells
> > the root complex where to send accesses to the VGA.
>
> Sort-of, again the root complex isn't "sending" anything targeted here.
> PCIe is point to point and any device is behind a bridge, real or
> virtual.
I think we are arguing about terminology here. root complex
has a virtual bridge for each port, presumably it examines bridge control
for each port to know which link to use for a VGA access.
I say presumably because VGA enable bit in bridge control
is not listed in spec (but as Alex says some real
hardware has it implemented).
> > But qemu currently puts devices directly on root bus.
>
> Sure, because qemu doesn't specifically model PCIe but something "else"
>
> > And as far as I can tell when we present devices directly on bus 0, we
> > pretend these are integrated in the root complex.
>
> Right, it's a bit gross.
>
> > The spec seems to
> > say explicitly that root complex integrated devices should not use legacy
> > addresses or support hotplug. So I would be surprised if such one
> > appears in real world.
>
> Sure but that doesn't change the fact that there's no point in treating
> things differently between PCI and PCIe for the sake of address range
> decoding. The high level model remains the same.
Yes, and it's not by chance.
> > Luckily guests do not seem to be worried as long as we use ACPI.
>
> Right, it all just looks like PCI to the guest anyway and is mostly
> treated as such for the sake of routing and decoding (until you turn on
> ARI but that's a different can of worms).
Right, ARI only affects config cycles.
> > > BTW, I've been working on vfio-pci support of VGA assignment which makes
> > > use of the VGA arbiter in the host to manipulate the VGA Enable control
> > > register, allowing us to select which device to access. The qemu side
> > > is simply registering memory regions for the VGA areas and expecting to
> > > be used with -vga none, but I'll adopt whatever strategy we choose for
> > > hard coded address range support. Current base patches at the links
> > > below. Thanks,
> > >
> > > Alex
> > >
> > > https://github.com/awilliam/qemu-vfio/commit/ea2befa59010a429dcf13c10dbccdf8b64e82fbd
> > > https://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio/commit/bae182d929229cbf1eaeb01e5fad4f77f81a4c61
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-31 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-29 15:41 KVM call minutes 2013-01-29 Juan Quintela
2013-01-29 16:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-29 16:47 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-01-29 17:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-29 20:53 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-29 21:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-01-30 7:02 ` What to do about non-qdevified devices? (was: KVM call minutes 2013-01-29) Markus Armbruster
2013-01-30 8:39 ` What to do about non-qdevified devices? Andreas Färber
2013-01-30 10:36 ` What to do about non-qdevified devices? (was: KVM call minutes 2013-01-29) Peter Maydell
2013-01-30 12:35 ` What to do about non-qdevified devices? Markus Armbruster
2013-01-30 13:44 ` [Qemu-devel] " Andreas Färber
2013-01-30 16:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-30 17:14 ` [Qemu-devel] " Andreas Färber
2013-01-31 18:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-01-30 14:37 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2013-01-30 11:39 ` [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes 2013-01-29 - Port I/O Andreas Färber
2013-01-30 11:48 ` Peter Maydell
2013-01-30 12:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-30 13:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2013-01-30 14:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-30 12:32 ` Alexander Graf
2013-01-30 13:09 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-01-30 15:08 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2013-01-30 17:55 ` Andreas Färber
2013-01-30 20:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-30 20:33 ` [Qemu-devel] " Andreas Färber
2013-01-30 20:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-30 13:59 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2013-01-30 21:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-01-30 21:39 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2013-01-30 21:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-01-30 22:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-30 22:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-01-30 22:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-30 23:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-01-30 23:28 ` Alex Williamson
2013-01-31 10:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-31 16:34 ` Alex Williamson
2013-01-31 21:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-31 21:21 ` Alex Williamson
2013-01-31 22:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-31 21:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-01-31 22:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-31 23:25 ` Alex Williamson
2013-01-31 21:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-01-31 22:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2013-01-30 15:45 ` [Qemu-devel] " Gerd Hoffmann
2013-01-30 16:33 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-01-30 16:54 ` Andreas Färber
2013-01-30 17:29 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2013-01-30 20:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-30 20:19 ` Peter Maydell
2013-01-30 20:19 ` [Qemu-devel] " Andreas Färber
2013-01-30 21:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-01-30 21:42 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2013-01-30 17:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-30 21:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130131222818.GB17928@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=alevy@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=hpoussin@reactos.org \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox