Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, apicv: Add Posted Interrupt supporting

Marcelo Tosatti
2013-02-08T02:07:48Z

On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 03:52:24PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > Its not a bad idea to have a new KVM_REQ_ bit for PIR processing (just
> > as the current patches do).
> Without the numbers I do not see why.

KVM_REQ_EVENT already means... counting... many things. Its a well
defined request, to sync PIR->VIRR, don't see your point about
performance.