From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] kvm: Make ioeventfd usable on s390.
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:43:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130225094338.24388fd8@gondolin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130224095639.GE25269@redhat.com>
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:56:39 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 01:09:45PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > Here's the second attempt at implementing ioeventfd for s390.
>
> The patchset looks fine overall.
> Minor comments and questions below.
Cool, thanks for reviewing.
>
> >
> > Rather than the architecture-specific functions used in v1, we
> > now try to integrate with the kvm_io_device infrastructure.
> > Calls to diagnose 500 subcode 3 are now mapped to _write.
> > These devices are created on a new KVM_CSS_BUS when using a
> > new flag KVM_IOEVENTFD_FLAG_CSS. addr and datamatch are (ab)used
> > to contain the subchannel id and the virtqueue.
> >
> > A drawback is that this interface is not easily extendable should
> > we want to attach other hypercalls or carry more payload.
>
> Under s390 kvm_hypercallX already uses diagnose 500 so that seems
> fine. If you want to make it more generic and support
> more subcodes, I think you'll have to pass an extra u64 field:
> to bus to both avoid overflowing int value and avoid ugly
> bus-specific hacks in generic code.
>
> Will we ever need that? Code using subcode 3 does not yet seem
> to be upstream in 3.8 so maybe yes, but you decide.
Subcode 3 will be in 3.9.
> An alternative is to add new bus types when kvm needs to handle
> new subcodes. So e.g. KVM_BUS_S390_VIRTIO_CCW_NOTIFY and
> KVM_BUS_S390_VIRTIO_NOTIFY ?
I think I'll fall back to a new bus type should we ever need a new
notification type - the less strange hacks, the better.
>
> You decide, I'm fine with either approach.
>
> More minor comments and questions in response to individual patches.
>
> > Another limitation is the limit of 1000 io devices per bus, which
> > we would hit easily with a few hundred devices, but that should
> > be fixable.
> >
> > v1 -> v2:
> > - Move irqfd initialization from a module init function to kvm_init,
> > eliminating the need for a second module for kvm/s390.
> > - Use kvm_io_device for s390 css devices.
> >
> >
> > Cornelia Huck (4):
> > KVM: Initialize irqfd from kvm_init().
> > KVM: Introduce KVM_CSS_BUS.
> > KVM: ioeventfd for s390 css devices.
> > KVM: s390: Wire up ioeventfd.
> >
> > Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 7 +++++++
> > arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig | 1 +
> > arch/s390/kvm/Makefile | 2 +-
> > arch/s390/kvm/diag.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 1 +
> > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 2 ++
> > virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 6 ++++++
> > 9 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.12.4
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-25 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-22 12:09 [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] kvm: Make ioeventfd usable on s390 Cornelia Huck
2013-02-22 12:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: Initialize irqfd from kvm_init() Cornelia Huck
2013-02-22 12:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: Introduce KVM_CSS_BUS Cornelia Huck
2013-02-24 9:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-02-25 8:50 ` Cornelia Huck
2013-02-22 12:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: ioeventfd for s390 css devices Cornelia Huck
2013-02-24 9:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-02-25 8:49 ` Cornelia Huck
2013-02-22 12:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: s390: Wire up ioeventfd Cornelia Huck
2013-02-24 9:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-02-25 8:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2013-02-24 9:40 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] kvm: Make ioeventfd usable on s390 Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-02-24 9:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-02-25 8:43 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130225094338.24388fd8@gondolin \
--to=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox