From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Convert INIT and SIPI signals into synchronously handled events
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:12:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130312131211.GB11223@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <513F1529.3040309@siemens.com>
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:44:41PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> A VCPU sending INIT or SIPI to some other VCPU races for setting the
> remote VCPU's mp_state. When we were unlucky, KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED
> was overwritten by kvm_emulate_halt and, thus, got lost.
>
> This introduces APIC events for those two signals, keeping them in
> kvm_apic until kvm_apic_accept_events is run over the target vcpu
> context. kvm_apic_has_events reports to kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable if there
> are pending events, thus if vcpu blocking should end.
>
> The patch comes with the side effect of effectively obsoleting
> KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED. We still accept it from user space, but
> immediately translate it to KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED + KVM_APIC_SIPI.
> The vcpu itself will no longer enter the KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED
> state. That also means we no longer exit to user space after receiving a
> SIPI event.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> ---
>
> This doesn't fix the wrong behaviour on INIT for the BSP yet. Leaving
> this honor to Paolo.
>
> I didn't try porting any INIT handling for nested on top yet but I
> think it should be feasible - once we know their semantics for sure, at
> least on Intel...
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 7 ++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 348d859..2d28e76 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1002,6 +1002,7 @@ int kvm_cpu_has_injectable_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *v);
> int kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> int kvm_arch_interrupt_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> int kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *v);
> +void kvm_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
> void kvm_define_shared_msr(unsigned index, u32 msr);
> void kvm_set_shared_msr(unsigned index, u64 val, u64 mask);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 02b51dd..4a21a6b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ static int __apic_accept_irq(struct kvm_lapic *apic, int delivery_mode,
> case APIC_DM_INIT:
> if (!trig_mode || level) {
> result = 1;
> - vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED;
> + set_bit(KVM_APIC_INIT, &apic->pending_events);
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
> kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> } else {
> @@ -743,13 +743,13 @@ static int __apic_accept_irq(struct kvm_lapic *apic, int delivery_mode,
> case APIC_DM_STARTUP:
> apic_debug("SIPI to vcpu %d vector 0x%02x\n",
> vcpu->vcpu_id, vector);
> - if (vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED) {
> - result = 1;
> - vcpu->arch.sipi_vector = vector;
> - vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED;
> - kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
> - kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> - }
> + result = 1;
> + apic->sipi_vector = vector;
> + /* make sure sipi_vector is visible for the receiver */
> + smp_wmb();
> + set_bit(KVM_APIC_SIPI, &apic->pending_events);
> + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
> + kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> break;
>
> case APIC_DM_EXTINT:
> @@ -1860,6 +1860,31 @@ int kvm_lapic_enable_pv_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data)
> addr);
> }
>
> +bool kvm_apic_has_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return kvm_vcpu_has_lapic(vcpu) && vcpu->arch.apic->pending_events;
The function is called only from kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable() and
kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable() is called only if irqchip is in kernel, so I
think kvm_vcpu_has_lapic() can be dropped.
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_apic_accept_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> +
> + if (!kvm_vcpu_has_lapic(vcpu))
> + return;
> +
> + if (test_and_clear_bit(KVM_APIC_INIT, &apic->pending_events))
> + vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED;
> + if (test_and_clear_bit(KVM_APIC_SIPI, &apic->pending_events) &&
> + vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED) {
> + vcpu->arch.sipi_vector = apic->sipi_vector;
> + pr_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
> + vcpu->vcpu_id, vcpu->arch.sipi_vector);
> + kvm_lapic_reset(vcpu);
> + kvm_vcpu_reset(vcpu);
Shouldn't we reset on KVM_APIC_INIT?
> + vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE;
> + }
> +}
> +
> void kvm_lapic_init(void)
> {
> /* do not patch jump label more than once per second */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> index 1676d34..ef3f4ef 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,9 @@
>
> #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>
> +#define KVM_APIC_INIT 0
> +#define KVM_APIC_SIPI 1
> +
> struct kvm_timer {
> struct hrtimer timer;
> s64 period; /* unit: ns */
> @@ -32,13 +35,17 @@ struct kvm_lapic {
> void *regs;
> gpa_t vapic_addr;
> struct page *vapic_page;
> + unsigned long pending_events;
> + unsigned int sipi_vector;
> };
> int kvm_create_lapic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_free_lapic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
> int kvm_apic_has_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +bool kvm_apic_has_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> int kvm_apic_accept_pic_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> int kvm_get_apic_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +void kvm_apic_accept_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_lapic_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> u64 kvm_lapic_get_cr8(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_lapic_set_tpr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr8);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index b891ac3..a0b8041 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -162,8 +162,6 @@ u64 __read_mostly host_xcr0;
>
> static int emulator_fix_hypercall(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt);
>
> -static void kvm_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> -
> static inline void kvm_async_pf_hash_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> int i;
> @@ -5663,6 +5661,11 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> bool req_immediate_exit = 0;
>
> if (vcpu->requests) {
> + kvm_apic_accept_events(vcpu);
> + if (vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED) {
> + r = 1;
> + goto out;
> + }
Why not call it under kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu) bellow?
> if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_MMU_RELOAD, vcpu))
> kvm_mmu_unload(vcpu);
> if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_MIGRATE_TIMER, vcpu))
> @@ -5847,14 +5850,6 @@ static int __vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> int r;
> struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>
> - if (unlikely(vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED)) {
> - pr_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
> - vcpu->vcpu_id, vcpu->arch.sipi_vector);
> - kvm_lapic_reset(vcpu);
> - kvm_vcpu_reset(vcpu);
> - vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE;
> - }
> -
> vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> r = vapic_enter(vcpu);
> if (r) {
> @@ -5871,8 +5866,8 @@ static int __vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
> kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
> vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> - if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu))
> - {
> + if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu)) {
> + kvm_apic_accept_events(vcpu);
> switch(vcpu->arch.mp_state) {
> case KVM_MP_STATE_HALTED:
> vcpu->arch.mp_state =
> @@ -5880,7 +5875,8 @@ static int __vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> case KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE:
> vcpu->arch.apf.halted = false;
> break;
> - case KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED:
> + case KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED:
> + break;
> default:
> r = -EINTR;
> break;
> @@ -5901,7 +5897,8 @@ static int __vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> ++vcpu->stat.request_irq_exits;
> }
>
> - kvm_check_async_pf_completion(vcpu);
> + if (vcpu->arch.mp_state != KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED)
> + kvm_check_async_pf_completion(vcpu);
Do not understand why is this 'if' needed.
>
> if (signal_pending(current)) {
> r = -EINTR;
> @@ -6015,6 +6012,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
>
> if (unlikely(vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_UNINITIALIZED)) {
> kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
> + kvm_apic_accept_events(vcpu);
> clear_bit(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, &vcpu->requests);
> r = -EAGAIN;
> goto out;
> @@ -6171,6 +6169,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_mp_state *mp_state)
> {
> + kvm_apic_accept_events(vcpu);
> mp_state->mp_state = vcpu->arch.mp_state;
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -6178,7 +6177,13 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_mp_state *mp_state)
> {
> - vcpu->arch.mp_state = mp_state->mp_state;
> + if (mp_state->mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED) {
> + if (!kvm_vcpu_has_lapic(vcpu))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED;
> + set_bit(KVM_APIC_SIPI, &vcpu->arch.apic->pending_events);
> + } else
> + vcpu->arch.mp_state = mp_state->mp_state;
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -6515,7 +6520,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> kvm_x86_ops->vcpu_free(vcpu);
> }
>
> -static void kvm_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +void kvm_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> atomic_set(&vcpu->arch.nmi_queued, 0);
> vcpu->arch.nmi_pending = 0;
> @@ -6988,7 +6993,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return (vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE &&
> !vcpu->arch.apf.halted)
> || !list_empty_careful(&vcpu->async_pf.done)
> - || vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED
> + || kvm_apic_has_events(vcpu)
> || atomic_read(&vcpu->arch.nmi_queued) ||
> (kvm_arch_interrupt_allowed(vcpu) &&
> kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(vcpu));
> --
> 1.7.3.4
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-12 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-12 11:44 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Convert INIT and SIPI signals into synchronously handled events Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 12:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-12 12:29 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-12 12:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-12 12:46 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 12:49 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-12 12:52 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 12:53 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-12 13:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-12 13:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 12:58 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 13:01 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 13:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-12 13:16 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 13:25 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-12 13:27 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 13:37 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-13 7:39 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-13 9:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-13 9:08 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 13:12 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-03-12 13:21 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 13:41 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-12 13:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-12 13:52 ` Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130312131211.GB11223@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox