From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: MMU: Mark sp mmio cached when creating mmio spte
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:33:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130313123358.GM11223@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51402DDA.607@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 03:42:18PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 03/13/2013 03:28 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:06:23 +0800
> > Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/12/2013 04:44 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> >>> This will be used not to zap unrelated mmu pages when creating/moving
> >>> a memory slot later.
> >>
> >> How about save all mmio spte into a mmio-rmap?
> >
> > The problem is that other mmu code would need to care about the pointers
> > stored in the new rmap list: when mmu_shrink zaps shadow pages for example.
>
> It is not hard... all the codes have been wrapped by *zap_spte*.
>
So are you going to send a patch? What do you think about applying this
as temporary solution?
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-13 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-12 8:43 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: Optimize mmio spte zapping when creating/moving memslot Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-03-12 8:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: MMU: Mark sp mmio cached when creating mmio spte Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-03-13 5:06 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-13 7:28 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-03-13 7:42 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-13 12:33 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-03-13 12:42 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-13 13:40 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-03-13 14:05 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-14 1:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-14 2:26 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-03-14 2:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-14 5:36 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-14 5:13 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-14 5:45 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-16 2:01 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-03-12 8:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Optimize mmio spte zapping when creating/moving memslot Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-03-12 12:06 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-13 1:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-13 1:41 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: " Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-14 8:23 ` Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130313123358.GM11223@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox