From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Do not overwrite vcpu->srcu_idx in vmx_vcpu_reset
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:00:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130314150004.GX11223@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5141E41B.8080804@siemens.com>
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 03:52:11PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> vmx_vcpu_reset may now be called while already holding the srcu lock, so
> we may overwrite what was already saved there. Also, we lock and unlock
> in the same context, thus there was no need to save to the vcpu anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> ---
>
> Marcelo just suggested this as the simplest fix for the issue caused by
> the INIT/SIPI patch. Avoiding srcu lock for TSS handling might still be
> possible but more tricky.
>
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 5 +++--
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 958ac3a..be5b1dc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -4117,6 +4117,7 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> u64 msr;
> + int idx;
>
> vmx->rmode.vm86_active = 0;
>
> @@ -4190,9 +4191,9 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> vmcs_write16(VIRTUAL_PROCESSOR_ID, vmx->vpid);
>
> vmx->vcpu.arch.cr0 = X86_CR0_NW | X86_CR0_CD | X86_CR0_ET;
> - vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
> + idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
> vmx_set_cr0(&vmx->vcpu, kvm_read_cr0(vcpu)); /* enter rmode */
> - srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
> + srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, idx);
vmx_set_cr0() does:
srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
vmx_set_tss_addr(vcpu->kvm, 0xfeffd000);
vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
So with this change the sequence will be:
vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock()
idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, idx);
srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
Not sure this is valid.
> vmx_set_cr4(&vmx->vcpu, 0);
> vmx_set_efer(&vmx->vcpu, 0);
> vmx_fpu_activate(&vmx->vcpu);
> --
> 1.7.3.4
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-14 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-14 14:52 [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Do not overwrite vcpu->srcu_idx in vmx_vcpu_reset Jan Kiszka
2013-03-14 15:00 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-03-14 15:03 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-14 15:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-14 15:11 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-14 15:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-14 15:11 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-14 19:14 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-14 19:20 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-14 19:39 ` [PATCH v2] " Jan Kiszka
2013-03-15 7:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-14 20:02 ` [PATCH] " Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130314150004.GX11223@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox