public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Nadav Har'El" <nyh@math.technion.ac.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: nVMX: Fix conditions for NMI and interrupt injection
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:12:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130314151225.GY11223@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d144ee7b8a4019cbe0b054f309f2e4d1a7cc0f41.1363193625.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com>

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 05:53:45PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> If we are in guest mode, L0 can only inject events into L2 if L1 has
> nothing pending. Otherwise, L0 would overwrite L1's events and they
> would get lost. This check is conceptually independent of
> nested_exit_on_intr.
> 
> If L1 traps external interrupts, then we also need to look at L1's
> idt_vectoring_info_field. If it is empty, we can kick the guest from L2
> to L1, just like the previous code worked.
> 
> Finally, the logic for checking interrupt has to be applied also on NMIs
> in an analogous way. This enables NMI interception for nested guests.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c |   59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index b50174d..10de336 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -4211,6 +4211,12 @@ static bool nested_exit_on_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		PIN_BASED_EXT_INTR_MASK;
>  }
>  
> +static bool nested_exit_on_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	return get_vmcs12(vcpu)->pin_based_vm_exec_control &
> +		PIN_BASED_NMI_EXITING;
> +}
> +
>  static void enable_irq_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	u32 cpu_based_vm_exec_control;
> @@ -4307,6 +4313,30 @@ static void vmx_inject_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  static int vmx_nmi_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> +	if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) {
> +		struct vmcs12 *vmcs12 = get_vmcs12(vcpu);
> +
> +		if (to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_run_pending &&
> +		    (vmcs12->vm_entry_intr_info_field & INTR_INFO_VALID_MASK))
> +			return 0;
> +		if (nested_exit_on_nmi(vcpu)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Check if the idt_vectoring_info_field is free. We
> +			 * cannot raise EXIT_REASON_EXCEPTION_NMI if it isn't.
> +			 */
> +			if (vmcs12->idt_vectoring_info_field &
> +			    VECTORING_INFO_VALID_MASK)
> +				return 0;
> +			nested_vmx_vmexit(vcpu);
> +			vmcs12->vm_exit_reason = EXIT_REASON_EXCEPTION_NMI;
> +			vmcs12->vm_exit_intr_info = NMI_VECTOR |
> +				INTR_TYPE_NMI_INTR | INTR_INFO_VALID_MASK;
> +			/*
> +			 * fall through to normal code, but now in L1, not L2
> +			 */
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	if (!cpu_has_virtual_nmis() && to_vmx(vcpu)->soft_vnmi_blocked)
>  		return 0;
>  
> @@ -4346,16 +4376,29 @@ static void vmx_set_nmi_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool masked)
>  
>  static int vmx_interrupt_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> -	if (is_guest_mode(vcpu) && nested_exit_on_intr(vcpu)) {
> +	if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) {
>  		struct vmcs12 *vmcs12 = get_vmcs12(vcpu);
> -		if (to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_run_pending ||
> -		    (vmcs12->idt_vectoring_info_field &
> -		     VECTORING_INFO_VALID_MASK))
> +
> +		if (to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_run_pending &&
> +		    (vmcs12->vm_entry_intr_info_field & INTR_INFO_VALID_MASK))
>  			return 0;
I do not understand this. As far as I remember Nadav's explanation we
have to enter guest if nested_run_pending is set because VMX does not
expect vmexit to happen without running guest at all. May be
idt_vectoring_info_field processing is the only reason, may be not. I
wouldn't gamble on it.

> -		nested_vmx_vmexit(vcpu);
> -		vmcs12->vm_exit_reason = EXIT_REASON_EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT;
> -		vmcs12->vm_exit_intr_info = 0;
> -		/* fall through to normal code, but now in L1, not L2 */
> +		if (nested_exit_on_intr(vcpu)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Check if the idt_vectoring_info_field is free. We
> +			 * cannot raise EXIT_REASON_EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT if it
> +			 * isn't.
> +			 */
> +			if (vmcs12->idt_vectoring_info_field &
> +			    VECTORING_INFO_VALID_MASK)
> +				return 0;
I think we actually need to return 0 if idt_vectoring_info_field is
valid even if !nested_exit_on_intr(). If we do not we let L0 inject
interrupt into L2 and then overwrite it on entry from
vmcs12->idt_vectoring_info_field.

> +			vmcs12->vm_exit_reason =
> +				EXIT_REASON_EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT;
> +			vmcs12->vm_exit_intr_info = 0;
> +			/*
> +			 * fall through to normal code, but now in L1, not L2
> +			 */
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	return (vmcs_readl(GUEST_RFLAGS) & X86_EFLAGS_IF) &&
> -- 
> 1.7.3.4

--
			Gleb.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-14 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-13 16:53 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: nVMX: Make direct IRQ/NMI injection work Jan Kiszka
2013-03-13 16:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: nVMX: Fix injection of PENDING_INTERRUPT and NMI_WINDOW exits to L1 Jan Kiszka
2013-03-13 16:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: nVMX: Fix conditions for NMI and interrupt injection Jan Kiszka
2013-03-14 13:59   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-14 15:33     ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-14 15:12   ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-03-14 15:24     ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-14 15:37       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-14 15:41         ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-13 16:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: nVMX: Rework event injection and recovery Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130314151225.GY11223@redhat.com \
    --to=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=nyh@math.technion.ac.il \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox