From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: allow host header to be included even for !CONFIG_KVM Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 09:29:55 +0200 Message-ID: <20130321072955.GO3889@redhat.com> References: <1363306426-27209-1-git-send-email-khilman@linaro.org> <1363823921.25034.35@snotra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Kevin Hilman , Frederic Weisbecker , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, Marcelo Tosatti , "open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MA..." , open list To: Scott Wood Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1363823921.25034.35@snotra> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 06:58:41PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On 03/14/2013 07:13:46 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >The new context tracking subsystem unconditionally includes kvm_host.h > >headers for the guest enter/exit macros. This causes a compile > >failure when KVM is not enabled. > > > >Fix by adding an IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM) check to kvm_host so it can > >be included/compiled even when KVM is not enabled. > > > >Cc: Frederic Weisbecker > >Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman > >--- > >Applies on v3.9-rc2 > > > > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 7 ++++++- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > This broke the PPC non-KVM build, which was relying on stub > functions in kvm_ppc.h, which relies on "struct vcpu" in kvm_host.h. > > Why can't the entirety kvm_host.h be included regardless of > CONFIG_KVM, just like most other feature-specific headers? Why > can't the if/else just go around the functions that you want to stub > out for non-KVM builds? > Kevin, What compilation failure this patch fixes? I presume something ARM related. -- Gleb.