From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/6] kvm: add PV MMIO Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 16:34:25 +0300 Message-ID: <20130404133425.GJ6467@redhat.com> References: <183f242d45ed0e10dd6feb73fd3f434738c08ae4.1365071407.git.mst@redhat.com> <20130404131108.GG6467@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, gleb@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com To: Peter Maydell Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13417 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761857Ab3DDOdZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:33:25 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 03:23:43PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 4 April 2013 14:11, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 01:50:36PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> Can we keep linux-headers updates in separate patches, please > >> (with commit messages saying what kernel commit/version the > >> sync is with)? > > > OK, first it needs to get into linux though :). > > In that case you need an RFC tag on your patches :-) > > -- PMM The cover letter said patches 5 and 6 are RFC, but patches 1-4 are ready and should go in I think. -- MST