From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"mtosatti@redhat.com" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/7] KVM: Add reset/restore rtc_status support
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 15:42:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130407124249.GT17919@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E09A022AE@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 12:39:32PM +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-04-07:
> > On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 02:30:15AM +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> >> Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-04-04:
> >>> On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:40:13AM +0800, Yang Zhang wrote:
> >>>> From: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@Intel.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@Intel.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 9 +++++++++ arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 2 ++
> >>>> virt/kvm/ioapic.c | 43
> >>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ virt/kvm/ioapic.h | 1 +
> >>>> 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> >>>> index 96ab160..9c041fa 100644
> >>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> >>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> >>>> @@ -94,6 +94,14 @@ static inline int apic_test_vector(int vec, void *bitmap)
> >>>> return test_bit(VEC_POS(vec), (bitmap) + REG_POS(vec));
> >>>> }
> >>>> +bool kvm_apic_pending_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return apic_test_vector(vector, apic->regs + APIC_ISR) ||
> >>>> + apic_test_vector(vector, apic->regs + APIC_IRR);
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> static inline void apic_set_vector(int vec, void *bitmap)
> >>>> {
> >>>> set_bit(VEC_POS(vec), (bitmap) + REG_POS(vec));
> >>>> @@ -1665,6 +1673,7 @@ void kvm_apic_post_state_restore(struct
> > kvm_vcpu
> >>> *vcpu,
> >>>> apic->highest_isr_cache = -1;
> >>>> kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_isr_update(vcpu->kvm,
> >>>> apic_find_highest_isr(apic)); kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT,
> >>>> vcpu); + kvm_rtc_irq_restore(vcpu); }
> >>>>
> >>>> void __kvm_migrate_apic_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> >>>> index 967519c..004d2ad 100644
> >>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> >>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> >>>> @@ -170,4 +170,6 @@ static inline bool kvm_apic_has_events(struct
> >>> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >>>> return vcpu->arch.apic->pending_events;
> >>>> }
> >>>> +bool kvm_apic_pending_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector);
> >>>> +
> >>>> #endif
> >>>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
> >>>> index 8664812..0b12b17 100644
> >>>> --- a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
> >>>> +++ b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
> >>>> @@ -90,6 +90,47 @@ static unsigned long ioapic_read_indirect(struct
> >>> kvm_ioapic *ioapic,
> >>>> return result;
> >>>> }
> >>>> +static void rtc_irq_reset(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + ioapic->rtc_status.pending_eoi = 0;
> >>>> + bitmap_zero(ioapic->rtc_status.dest_map, KVM_MAX_VCPUS);
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static void rtc_irq_restore(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> >>>> + int vector, i, pending_eoi = 0;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + if (RTC_GSI >= IOAPIC_NUM_PINS)
> >>>> + return;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + vector = ioapic->redirtbl[RTC_GSI].fields.vector;
> >>>> + kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, ioapic->kvm) {
> >>>> + if (kvm_apic_pending_eoi(vcpu, vector)) {
> >>>> + pending_eoi++;
> >>>> + __set_bit(vcpu->vcpu_id, ioapic->rtc_status.dest_map);
> >>> You should cleat dest_map at the beginning to get rid of stale bits.
> >> I thought kvm_set_ioapic is called only after save/restore or migration. And the
> > ioapic should be reset successfully before call it. So the dest_map is empty
> > before call rtc_irq_restore().
> >> But it is possible kvm_set_ioapic is called beside save/restore or
> >> migration. Right?
> >>
> > First of all userspace should not care when it calls kvm_set_ioapic()
> > the kernel need to do the right thing. Second, believe it or not,
> > kvm_ioapic_reset() is not called during system reset. Instead userspace
> > reset it by calling kvm_set_ioapic() with ioapic state after reset.
> Ok. I see. As the logic you suggested, it will clear dest_map if no pending eoi in vcpu, so we don't need to do it again.
>
You again rely on userspace doing thing in certain manner. What is
set_lapic() is never called? Kernel internal state have to be correct
after each ioctl call.
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-07 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-01 0:40 [PATCH v7 0/7] Use eoi to track RTC interrupt delivery status Yang Zhang
2013-04-01 0:40 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] KVM: Add vcpu info to ioapic_update_eoi() Yang Zhang
2013-04-01 0:40 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] KVM: Introduce struct rtc_status Yang Zhang
2013-04-01 0:40 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] KVM : Return destination vcpu on interrupt injection Yang Zhang
2013-04-01 0:40 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] KVM: Add reset/restore rtc_status support Yang Zhang
2013-04-04 11:58 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-07 2:30 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-04-07 9:17 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-07 12:39 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-04-07 12:42 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-04-07 13:05 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-04-07 13:08 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-07 13:16 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-04-07 13:32 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-07 13:46 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-04-07 13:55 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-08 11:21 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-04-08 12:45 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-08 13:12 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-04-01 0:40 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] KVM : Force vmexit with virtual interrupt delivery Yang Zhang
2013-04-01 0:40 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] KVM: Let ioapic know the irq line status Yang Zhang
2013-04-01 0:40 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] KVM: Use eoi to track RTC interrupt delivery status Yang Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130407124249.GT17919@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=xiantao.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox