Re: [PATCH 03/17] KVM: Drop __KVM_HAVE_IOAPIC condition on irq routing

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 04:06:14PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> We have a capability enquire system that allows user space to ask kvm
> whether a feature is available.
> 
> The point behind this system is that we can have different kernel
> configurations with different capabilities and user space can adjust
> accordingly.
> 
> Because features can always be non existent, we can drop any #ifdefs
> on CAP defines that could be used generically, like the irq routing
> bits. These can be easily reused for non-IOAPIC systems as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>

Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/kvm.h |    2 --
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 74d0ff3..c741902 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -579,9 +579,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info {
>  #ifdef __KVM_HAVE_PIT
>  #define KVM_CAP_REINJECT_CONTROL 24
>  #endif
> -#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_IOAPIC
>  #define KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING 25
> -#endif
>  #define KVM_CAP_IRQ_INJECT_STATUS 26
>  #ifdef __KVM_HAVE_DEVICE_ASSIGNMENT
>  #define KVM_CAP_DEVICE_DEASSIGNMENT 27
> -- 
> 1.6.0.2
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html