From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Sanjay Lal <sanjayl@kymasys.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] mips/kvm: Fix ABI for compatibility with 64-bit guests.
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 20:09:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130523170927.GM26157@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <519E4A98.7020903@caviumnetworks.com>
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 09:58:00AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> On 05/23/2013 03:28 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:43:50AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> >>From: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
> >>
> >Please regenerate against master. arch/mips/include/asm/kvm.h does not
> >exists any more.
>
> New patch sent. I gather from this message, that you want to merge
> this particular set via your tree instead of Ralf's MIPS tree.
> That's fine with me. However, we were hoping to have these ABI
> fixing patches pushed to Linus before 3.10 releases, so that there
> don't exist kernel versions with the defective ABI.
>
I do plan to push them to 3.10 that is why I asked to generate them
against master ("next" branch is for next merge window)
> Future patch sets may affect core MIPS architecture files, and
> therefore may not be so amenable to merging via the KVM tree. We
> will have to figure out how to handle that.
>
Are you talking about initial MIPS HW vitalization support? Lets see
the patch series. If core changes are to big for for Ralf to ack them
and push through kvm.git then we can push them via MPIS tree.
--
Gleb.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-23 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-22 18:43 [PATCH v5 0/6] mips/kvm: Fix ABI for compatibility with 64-bit guests David Daney
2013-05-22 18:43 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] mips/kvm: Fix ABI for use of FPU David Daney
2013-05-22 18:43 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] mips/kvm: Fix ABI for use of 64-bit registers David Daney
2013-05-22 18:43 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] mips/kvm: Fix name of gpr field in struct kvm_regs David Daney
2013-05-22 18:43 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] mips/kvm: Use ARRAY_SIZE() instead of hardcoded constants in kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_{s,g}et_regs David Daney
2013-05-22 18:43 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] mips/kvm: Fix ABI by moving manipulation of CP0 registers to KVM_{G,S}ET_ONE_REG David Daney
2013-06-08 11:05 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-09 22:57 ` David Daney
2013-05-22 18:43 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] mips/kvm: Use ENOIOCTLCMD to indicate unimplemented ioctls David Daney
2013-05-22 19:05 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] mips/kvm: Fix ABI for compatibility with 64-bit guests Sanjay Lal
2013-05-23 10:28 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-23 16:58 ` David Daney
2013-05-23 17:09 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130523170927.GM26157@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=sanjayl@kymasys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox