From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] KVM: MMU: fast zap all shadow pages
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 22:26:01 -0300
Message-ID: <20130605012601.GA2518@amt.cnet>
References: <1369960590-14138-1-git-send-email-xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: gleb@redhat.com, avi.kivity@gmail.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41835 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751117Ab3FEB0S (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 21:26:18 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1369960590-14138-1-git-send-email-xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:36:19AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Hi Gleb, Paolo, Marcelo,
> 
> I have putted the potential controversial patches to the latter that are
> patch 8 ~ 10, patch 11 depends on patch 9. Other patches are fully reviewed,
> I think its are ready for being merged. If not luck enough, further discussion
> is needed, could you please apply that patches first? :)
> 
> Thank you in advance!

<snip>

Looks good to me.