From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: KVM call agenda for 2013-06-11 Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 19:50:41 +0300 Message-ID: <20130610165041.GA31210@redhat.com> References: <20130604132431.GA24301@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Juan Quintela , KVM devel mailing list , lersek@redhat.com, "Kevin O'Connor" , ddutile@redhat.com, Anthony Liguori , dwmw2@infradead.org, jljusten@gmail.com To: seabios@seabios.org, qemu-devel Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12651 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750769Ab3FJQuw (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:50:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130604132431.GA24301@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 04:24:31PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Juan is not available now, and Anthony asked for > agenda to be sent early. > So here comes: > > Agenda for the meeting Tue, June 11: > > - Generating acpi tables, redux I've just posted a proof of concept patch on list, as promised. Since Anthony (apparently, alone?) is objecting to this on principle I don't think there's need to spend time testing it at this stage: I'd like to use the meeting to discuss the requirements coming from ACPI spec and how this patch addresses them, and how generating the SSDT table in qemu makes life easier, and would be awkward in the bios. Also, to address comments raised on the previous conf call. I hope that at the end of the meeting we'll be able to arrive at concensus opinion re the usefulness of supplying ACPI tables to guests (on PC only). > Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering. > > Thanks, MST > > -- > MST