public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Avoid zapping mmio sptes twice for generation wraparound
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 12:03:27 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130703090327.GE18508@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51D3E77F.2060805@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:57:35AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 03/07/2013 10:53, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> >>> > > Please wait a while. I can not understand it very clearly.
> >>> > > 
> >>> > > This conditional check will cause caching a overflow value into mmio spte.
> >>> > > The simple case is that kvm adds new slots for many times, the mmio-gen is easily
> >>> > > more than MMIO_MAX_GEN.
> >>> > > 
> >> > 
> >> > Actually, the double zapping can be avoided by moving kvm_mmu_invalidate_mmio_sptes to
> >> > the end of install_new_memslots().
> >> > 
> > Exactly. Why should we hide it in obscure functions?
> 
> Because kvm_mmu_invalidate_mmio_sptes is an x86-specific function, and
> we already have a good arch API to hook into __kvm_set_memory_region.
> 
>From this patch it can be seen that the API is not good enough.
Generation update API is missing.

> Another possible implementation is to cache the last memslot generation,
> check it in kvm_arch_prepare/commit_memory_region, and call
> kvm_mmu_invalidate_mmio_sptes if it changed.  This would avoid the need
> to keep "((change == KVM_MR_DELETE) || (change == KVM_MR_MOVE))" in sync
> between the two places.  But I don't think it is a substantial improvement.
> 
Why are you trying to overcome API shortcomings instead of fixing the API.
 
--
			Gleb.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-03  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-03  8:18 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Avoid zapping mmio sptes twice for generation wraparound Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-07-03  8:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-03  8:39   ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-03  8:50     ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-07-03  8:50       ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-03  8:50     ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-03  9:00       ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-03  8:50     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-03  8:53       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-03  8:57         ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-03  9:03           ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-07-03  8:53       ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-03  9:05         ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-07-03  9:05           ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-03  9:08             ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-03  9:10               ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-03  9:17                 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-07-03  9:18                 ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130703090327.GE18508@redhat.com \
    --to=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox