public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Arthur Chunqi Li <yzt356@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Subject: Re: IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL MSR in nested virt
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 12:14:46 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130703091446.GH18508@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABpY8MLoUkJ02FLtz+_WXFrt528-TYe5RV52Wk2avGB4QT4n0w@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 04:24:33PM +0800, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote:
> Hi Gleb and Paolo,
> When I write test cases for nested virt and found that reading/writing
>  IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL will be simply ignored or return 0 (in
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c) in VM. Checking this MSR will be done by some
> hypervisors (e.g. NOVA) and may cause error then, so it is necessary
> to behave right when read/write it in VM.
> 
NOVA cannot write to it and expect anything but #GP since BIOSes usually
lock the MSR. So I agree with Paolo about returning 5 on read and #GP on
write. Later we can implement locking functionality and make BIOS
enable/disable nested vmx.

> Are there any difficulties to handle this MSR? I have two solutions.
> The first one is return the value of physical CPU's and always return
> true when write. This is simple but may behave as if it is a VM
> because write to it after VMXON will not return GP exception. This
> solution can solve most basic problems since this MSR is not commonly
> used. Another solution is adding a field in VCPU to handle this MSR.
> This is a complex but better method.
> 
> I think I can complete this if needed.
> 
> Thanks,
> Arthur
> 
> --
> Arthur Chunqi Li
> Department of Computer Science
> School of EECS
> Peking University
> Beijing, China

--
			Gleb.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-03  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-03  8:24 IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL MSR in nested virt Arthur Chunqi Li
2013-07-03  8:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-03  8:46   ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-07-03  8:58     ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-03  9:14 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-07-03  9:32   ` Gmail
2013-07-03 14:48   ` Bandan Das
2013-07-03 14:59     ` Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130703091446.GH18508@redhat.com \
    --to=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=yzt356@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox