From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm-unit-tests : The first version of VMX nested test case Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:58:13 +0300 Message-ID: <20130716095813.GM11772@redhat.com> References: <1373966841-22206-1-git-send-email-yzt356@gmail.com> <20130716094550.GL11772@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kvm , Jan Kiszka , Paolo Bonzini To: Arthur Chunqi Li Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26796 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932131Ab3GPJ6R (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 05:58:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:53:56PM +0800, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:35:16PM +0800, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote: > >> Hi there, > >> This is a version calling for comments. Some minor changes should be > > Add RFC before PATCH for such submission please. > > > >> done before final commitment (TODOs in it), because these places are > >> related to the bugs I have commited in the previous weeks and the > >> relevant patches are not accpeted. But these bugs are all about some > > I am aware of only one patch. Did I miss/forgot something? > I have only commit one patch related to VMX tests. Other patches cited > here is about the bug fixes such as > [http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg92932.html] > [http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg93046.html], which > will cause some test cases fail in this patch. > Those are applied to queue already. I am aware of one that is not applied yet but it looks fine to me, waiting for Paolo's review. > I have been discussing with Jan in the past weeks because most of the > questions are technical affairs, which I don't think it's suitable to > discuss in the community. This is a rather mature version and I think > I can commit it with some minor changes. > > > >> unexpected occasions and the hypervisor can run if we simply ignore > >> them. After all bugs fixed, everything will be OK. > >> > >> Arthur > >> > > > > -- > > Gleb. -- Gleb.