From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Raghavendra K T Subject: [PATCH RFC V11 2/18] x86/ticketlock: Don't inline _spin_unlock when using paravirt spinlocks Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:47:04 +0530 Message-ID: <20130722061704.24737.74372.sendpatchset@codeblue> References: <20130722061631.24737.75508.sendpatchset@codeblue> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, , Raghavendra K T , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , To: , , , , , , Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130722061631.24737.75508.sendpatchset@codeblue> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org x86/ticketlock: Don't inline _spin_unlock when using paravirt spinlocks From: Raghavendra K T The code size expands somewhat, and its better to just call a function rather than inline it. Thanks Jeremy for original version of ARCH_NOINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK config patch, which is simplified. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T --- arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index b32ebf9..112e712 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -632,6 +632,7 @@ config PARAVIRT_DEBUG config PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS bool "Paravirtualization layer for spinlocks" depends on PARAVIRT && SMP + select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK ---help--- Paravirtualized spinlocks allow a pvops backend to replace the spinlock implementation with something virtualization-friendly