From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>,
pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/13] nEPT: Move common code to paging_tmpl.h
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 11:36:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130731083655.GA7484@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51F8C4A9.4070502@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 04:02:49PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 07/25/2013 06:59 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > From: Nadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
> >
> > For preparation, we just move gpte_access(), prefetch_invalid_gpte(),
> > s_rsvd_bits_set(), protect_clean_gpte() and is_dirty_gpte() from mmu.c
> > to paging_tmpl.h.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Xinhao Xu <xinhao.xu@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@Intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 55 ------------------------------
> > arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> > index 3a9493a..4c4274d 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> > @@ -331,11 +331,6 @@ static int is_large_pte(u64 pte)
> > return pte & PT_PAGE_SIZE_MASK;
> > }
> >
> > -static int is_dirty_gpte(unsigned long pte)
> > -{
> > - return pte & PT_DIRTY_MASK;
> > -}
> > -
> > static int is_rmap_spte(u64 pte)
> > {
> > return is_shadow_present_pte(pte);
> > @@ -2574,14 +2569,6 @@ static void nonpaging_new_cr3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > mmu_free_roots(vcpu);
> > }
> >
> > -static bool is_rsvd_bits_set(struct kvm_mmu *mmu, u64 gpte, int level)
> > -{
> > - int bit7;
> > -
> > - bit7 = (gpte >> 7) & 1;
> > - return (gpte & mmu->rsvd_bits_mask[bit7][level-1]) != 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > static pfn_t pte_prefetch_gfn_to_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
> > bool no_dirty_log)
> > {
> > @@ -2594,26 +2581,6 @@ static pfn_t pte_prefetch_gfn_to_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
> > return gfn_to_pfn_memslot_atomic(slot, gfn);
> > }
> >
> > -static bool prefetch_invalid_gpte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > - struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *spte,
> > - u64 gpte)
> > -{
> > - if (is_rsvd_bits_set(&vcpu->arch.mmu, gpte, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL))
> > - goto no_present;
> > -
> > - if (!is_present_gpte(gpte))
> > - goto no_present;
> > -
> > - if (!(gpte & PT_ACCESSED_MASK))
> > - goto no_present;
> > -
> > - return false;
> > -
> > -no_present:
> > - drop_spte(vcpu->kvm, spte);
> > - return true;
> > -}
> > -
> > static int direct_pte_prefetch_many(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
> > u64 *start, u64 *end)
> > @@ -3501,18 +3468,6 @@ static void paging_free(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > nonpaging_free(vcpu);
> > }
> >
> > -static inline void protect_clean_gpte(unsigned *access, unsigned gpte)
> > -{
> > - unsigned mask;
> > -
> > - BUILD_BUG_ON(PT_WRITABLE_MASK != ACC_WRITE_MASK);
> > -
> > - mask = (unsigned)~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
> > - /* Allow write access to dirty gptes */
> > - mask |= (gpte >> (PT_DIRTY_SHIFT - PT_WRITABLE_SHIFT)) & PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
> > - *access &= mask;
> > -}
> > -
> > static bool sync_mmio_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep, gfn_t gfn,
> > unsigned access, int *nr_present)
> > {
> > @@ -3530,16 +3485,6 @@ static bool sync_mmio_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep, gfn_t gfn,
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > -static inline unsigned gpte_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpte)
> > -{
> > - unsigned access;
> > -
> > - access = (gpte & (PT_WRITABLE_MASK | PT_USER_MASK)) | ACC_EXEC_MASK;
> > - access &= ~(gpte >> PT64_NX_SHIFT);
> > -
> > - return access;
> > -}
> > -
> > static inline bool is_last_gpte(struct kvm_mmu *mmu, unsigned level, unsigned gpte)
> > {
> > unsigned index;
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> > index 7769699..fb26ca9 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> > @@ -80,6 +80,31 @@ static gfn_t gpte_to_gfn_lvl(pt_element_t gpte, int lvl)
> > return (gpte & PT_LVL_ADDR_MASK(lvl)) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline void FNAME(protect_clean_gpte)(unsigned *access, unsigned gpte)
> > +{
> > + unsigned mask;
> > +
> > + BUILD_BUG_ON(PT_WRITABLE_MASK != ACC_WRITE_MASK);
> > +
> > + mask = (unsigned)~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
> > + /* Allow write access to dirty gptes */
> > + mask |= (gpte >> (PT_DIRTY_SHIFT - PT_WRITABLE_SHIFT)) & PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
> > + *access &= mask;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool FNAME(is_rsvd_bits_set)(struct kvm_mmu *mmu, u64 gpte, int level)
> > +{
> > + int bit7;
> > +
> > + bit7 = (gpte >> 7) & 1;
> > + return (gpte & mmu->rsvd_bits_mask[bit7][level-1]) != 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int FNAME(is_present_gpte)(unsigned long pte)
> > +{
> > + return is_present_gpte(pte);
> > +}
>
> It is adding a new function not just move and failed to mention it in the
> change log. :)
>
> > +
> > static int FNAME(cmpxchg_gpte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *mmu,
> > pt_element_t __user *ptep_user, unsigned index,
> > pt_element_t orig_pte, pt_element_t new_pte)
> > @@ -103,6 +128,36 @@ static int FNAME(cmpxchg_gpte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *mmu,
> > return (ret != orig_pte);
> > }
> >
> > +static bool FNAME(prefetch_invalid_gpte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > + struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *spte,
> > + u64 gpte)
> > +{
> > + if (FNAME(is_rsvd_bits_set)(&vcpu->arch.mmu, gpte, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL))
> > + goto no_present;
> > +
> > + if (!FNAME(is_present_gpte)(gpte))
> > + goto no_present;
> > +
> > + if (!(gpte & PT_ACCESSED_MASK))
> > + goto no_present;
> > +
> > + return false;
> > +
> > +no_present:
> > + drop_spte(vcpu->kvm, spte);
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline unsigned FNAME(gpte_access)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpte)
> > +{
> > + unsigned access;
> > +
> > + access = (gpte & (PT_WRITABLE_MASK | PT_USER_MASK)) | ACC_EXEC_MASK;
> > + access &= ~(gpte >> PT64_NX_SHIFT);
> > +
> > + return access;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int FNAME(update_accessed_dirty_bits)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > struct kvm_mmu *mmu,
> > struct guest_walker *walker,
> > @@ -123,7 +178,8 @@ static int FNAME(update_accessed_dirty_bits)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > trace_kvm_mmu_set_accessed_bit(table_gfn, index, sizeof(pte));
> > pte |= PT_ACCESSED_MASK;
> > }
> > - if (level == walker->level && write_fault && !is_dirty_gpte(pte)) {
> > + if (level == walker->level && write_fault &&
> > + !(pte & PT_DIRTY_MASK)) {
>
> Why use the raw code instead of the function? Since it is the only user of
> this function, so drop the function?
>
Yes, I have two choses either move the function to paging_tmpl.h and
make it FNAME(is_dirty_gpte)() or just drop it since other bits we check
in pte are open coded anyway. Dropping function seems more consistent
with the rest of the code.
> Others look good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-31 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-25 10:59 [PATCH v4 00/13] Nested EPT Gleb Natapov
2013-07-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] nEPT: Support LOAD_IA32_EFER entry/exit controls for L1 Gleb Natapov
2013-07-29 8:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-29 13:12 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-29 14:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] nEPT: Fix cr3 handling in nested exit and entry Gleb Natapov
2013-07-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] nEPT: Fix wrong test in kvm_set_cr3 Gleb Natapov
2013-07-29 8:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-29 10:43 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-31 8:02 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] nEPT: Move common code to paging_tmpl.h Gleb Natapov
2013-07-31 8:02 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-31 8:36 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-07-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] nEPT: make guest's A/D bits depends on guest's paging mode Gleb Natapov
2013-07-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] nEPT: Add EPT tables support to paging_tmpl.h Gleb Natapov
2013-07-29 9:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-29 11:33 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-29 11:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-29 12:24 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-29 13:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-29 13:27 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-29 14:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-29 16:14 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-29 16:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-29 16:43 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-29 17:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-29 17:11 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-30 10:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-30 11:56 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-30 12:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-30 14:22 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-30 14:36 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] nEPT: Redefine EPT-specific link_shadow_page() Gleb Natapov
2013-07-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] nEPT: Nested INVEPT Gleb Natapov
2013-07-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] nEPT: Add nEPT violation/misconfigration support Gleb Natapov
2013-07-29 8:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-29 10:52 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-29 10:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-29 11:43 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-29 12:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-29 12:34 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-29 13:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-29 13:20 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-29 14:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-29 16:24 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-29 16:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-29 16:54 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] nEPT: MMU context for nested EPT Gleb Natapov
2013-07-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] nEPT: Advertise EPT to L1 Gleb Natapov
2013-07-29 9:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-29 11:11 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-29 11:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-29 11:35 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-25 11:00 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] nEPT: Some additional comments Gleb Natapov
2013-07-25 11:00 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] nEPT: Miscelleneous cleanups Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130731083655.GA7484@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox