From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] vhost_worker fixes
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 14:39:49 +0300
Message-ID: <20130814113949.GF5430@redhat.com>
References: <520B2B47.9040002@acm.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Asias He <asias@redhat.com>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:24328 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1759781Ab3HNLiP (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 14 Aug 2013 07:38:15 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <520B2B47.9040002@acm.org>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:01:27AM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> There are two patches in this series:
> * A patch that reduces vhost_work_flush() latency on busy systems.
> * A patch that avoids that vhost_work_flush() returns early.
> 
> I found these issues via code inspection.

Interesting. What makes you think vhost_work_flush
latency matters?

Please copy all relevant mailing lists in the future:
you can find them in the MAINTAINERS file.