Re: KVM Block Device Driver

Spensky, Chad - 0559 - MITLL
2013-08-14T12:19:47Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3459 bytes --]

Fam,

That's correct, we modified block.c to hook the appropriate functions
and output the information through a unix socket. One of the functions
that we hooked is bdrv_aio_writev, however it seems like the data that we
are seeing at that point in the callstack is not what actually makes it to
the disk image for the guest. The first couple of sectors always seem to
be the same, however after sector 2 it's a toss up. I'm guessing there
may be some sort of caching going on or something, and we appear to be
missing it.

- Chad

--
Chad S. Spensky

MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Group 59 (Cyber Systems Assessment)
Ph: (781) 981-4173

On 8/14/13 8:16 AM, "Fam Zheng" <famz@redhat.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 08/14 07:29, Spensky, Chad - 0559 - MITLL wrote:
>> Stefan, Fam,
>>
>> We are trying to keep an active shadow copy while the system is
>>running
>> without any need for pausing. More precisely we want to log every
>> individual access to the drive into a database so that the entire stream
>> of accesses could be replayed at a later time.
>>
>There's no IO request log infrastructure in QEMU for now. What
>drive-mirror can do is to repetitively send changed sectors since last
>sending point, but it's not in guest request order or operation size, it
>works just with a dirty bitmap.
>
>In your methodology you didn't mention the hook you worked in block.c,
>but I think it is necessary to hack block.c to log every r/w access to
>the drive, I think you synchronous each write to the shadow image,
>right?
>>
>>
>> On 8/14/13 6:05 AM, "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:40:06AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 08/13 16:13, Spensky, Chad - 0559 - MITLL wrote:
>> >> > Hi All,
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm working with some disk introspection on KVM, and we trying to
>> >>create
>> >> > a shadow image of the disk. We've hooked the functions in
>>block.c, in
>> >> > particular bdrv_aio_writev. However we are seeing writes go
>>through,
>> >> > pausing the VM, and the comparing our shadow image with the actual
>>VM
>> >> > image, and they aren't 100% synced up. The first 1-2 sectors
>>appear
>> >>to be
>> >> > always be correct, however, after that, there are sometimes some
>> >> > discrepancies. I believe we have exhausted most obvious bugs
>>(malloc
>> >> > bugs, incorrect size calculations etc.). Has anyone had any
>> >>experience
>> >> > with this or have any insights?
>> >> >
>> >> > Our methodology is as follows:
>> >> > 1. Boot the VM.
>> >> > 2. Pause VM.
>> >> > 3. Copy the disk to our shadow image.
>> >>
>> >> How do you copy the disk, from guest or host?
>> >>
>> >> > 4. Perform very few reads/writes.
>> >>
>> >> Did you flush to disk?
>> >>
>> >> > 5. Pause VM.
>> >> > 6. Compare shadow copy with active vm disk.
>> >> >
>> >> > And this is where we are seeing discrepancies. Any help is much
>> >> > appreciated! We are running on Ubuntu 12.04 with a modified Debian
>> >>build.
>> >> >
>> >> > - Chad
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Chad S. Spensky
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> I think drive-backup command does just what you want, it creates a
>>image
>> >> and copy-on-write date from guest disk to the target, without pausing
>> >> VM.
>> >
>> >Or perhaps drive-mirror.
>> >
>> >Maybe Chad can explain what the use case is. There is probably an
>> >existing command that does this or that could be extended to do this
>> >safely.
>> >
>> >Stefan
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 5142 bytes --]