From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: driver core patches Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:12:47 -0800 Message-ID: <20131106021247.GB6687@kroah.com> References: <9F6FE96B71CF29479FF1CDC8046E15036F480C@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "kim.phillips@linaro.org" To: Stuart Yoder Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9F6FE96B71CF29479FF1CDC8046E15036F480C@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 10:53:36PM +0000, Stuart Yoder wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Any feedback on the driver core patches in Kim Phillips patch series > from mid-October? > > The 3rd patch of the series has some open issues related to vfio-pci, > but the first two are driver core related and am wondering if they > are acceptable. As I saw there was lots of discussion, and some rework needed, I haven't paid any attention to them, expecting to see another set show up. Also, it's way past the merge window, and I can't do anything with any new patches until after 3.13-rc1 is out, combined with a travel-schedule-from-hell, and I really am not going to want to review these types of patches for a number of weeks. So take the time, fix them up, and send them after 3.13-rc2 is out or so and I should have a chance to look at them then. Hopefully I'll hate them less by then, but I'm not guaranteeing anything... thanks, greg k-h