RE: Error in frreing hugepages with preemption enabled

Bharat Bhushan
2013-12-05T11:14:54Z

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrea Arcangeli [mailto:aarcange@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 3:51 AM
> To: Alexander Graf
> Cc: Bhushan Bharat-R65777; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; kvm-
> ppc@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Ben Herrenschmidt
> Subject: Re: Error in frreing hugepages with preemption enabled
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:13:03PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >
> > On 29.11.2013, at 05:38, Bharat Bhushan <Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > I am running KVM guest with host kernel having CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled. With
> allocated pages things seems to work fine but I uses hugepages for guest I see
> below prints when "quit" from qemu.
> > >
> > > (qemu) QEMU waiting for connection on: telnet:0.0.0.0:4444,server
> > > qemu-system-ppc64: pci_add_option_rom: failed to find romfile "efi-
> virtio.rom"
> > > q
> > > debug_smp_processor_id: 15 callbacks suppressed
> > > BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code:
> > > qemu-system-ppc/2504 caller is .free_hugepd_range+0xb0/0x21c
> > > CPU: 1 PID: 2504 Comm: qemu-system-ppc Not tainted
> > > 3.12.0-rc3-07733-gabf4907 #175 Call Trace:
> > > [c0000000fb433400] [c000000000007d38] .show_stack+0x7c/0x1cc
> > > (unreliable) [c0000000fb4334d0] [c0000000005e8ce0]
> > > .dump_stack+0x9c/0xf4 [c0000000fb433560] [c0000000002de5ec]
> > > .debug_smp_processor_id+0x108/0x11c
> > > [c0000000fb4335f0] [c000000000025e10] .free_hugepd_range+0xb0/0x21c
> > > [c0000000fb433680] [c0000000000265bc]
> > > .hugetlb_free_pgd_range+0x2c8/0x3b0
> > > [c0000000fb4337a0] [c0000000000e428c] .free_pgtables+0x14c/0x158
> > > [c0000000fb433840] [c0000000000ef320] .exit_mmap+0xec/0x194
> > > [c0000000fb433960] [c00000000004d780] .mmput+0x64/0x124
> > > [c0000000fb4339e0] [c000000000051f40] .do_exit+0x29c/0x9c8
> > > [c0000000fb433ae0] [c0000000000527c8] .do_group_exit+0x50/0xc4
> > > [c0000000fb433b70] [c0000000000606a0]
> > > .get_signal_to_deliver+0x21c/0x5d8
> > > [c0000000fb433c70] [c000000000009b08] .do_signal+0x54/0x278
> > > [c0000000fb433db0] [c000000000009e50] .do_notify_resume+0x64/0x78
> > > [c0000000fb433e30] [c000000000000b44]
> > > .ret_from_except_lite+0x70/0x74
> > >
> > >
> > > This mean that free_hugepd_range() must be called with preemption enabled.
> >
> > with preemption disabled.
> >
> > > I tried below change and this seems to work fine (I am not having
> > > expertise in this area so not sure this is correct way)
> >
> > Not sure - the scope looks odd to me. Let's ask Andrea - I'm sure he knows
> what to do :).
>
> :) So I had a look at the top of this function (0xb0) in the upstream kernel and
> no smp_processor_id() call is apparent, is this stock git or a ppc tree? The
> first few calls seem not to call it but I may have overlooked something. It's
> just quicker if somebody with vmlinux finds the location of it.
>
> static void free_hugepd_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, hugepd_t *hpdp, int
> pdshift,
> unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> unsigned long floor, unsigned long ceiling) {
> pte_t *hugepte = hugepd_page(*hpdp);
> int i;
>
> unsigned long pdmask = ~((1UL << pdshift) - 1);
> unsigned int num_hugepd = 1;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FSL_BOOK3E
> /* Note: On fsl the hpdp may be the first of several */
> num_hugepd = (1 << (hugepd_shift(*hpdp) - pdshift)); #else
> unsigned int shift = hugepd_shift(*hpdp); #endif
>
> start &= pdmask;
> if (start < floor)
> return;
> if (ceiling) {
> ceiling &= pdmask;
> if (! ceiling)
> return;
> }
> if (end - 1 > ceiling - 1)
> return;
>
> for (i = 0; i < num_hugepd; i++, hpdp++)
> hpdp->pd = 0;
>
> tlb->need_flush = 1;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FSL_BOOK3E
> hugepd_free(tlb, hugepte);
> #else
> pgtable_free_tlb(tlb, hugepte, pdshift - shift); #endif }
>
> Generally smp_processor_id should never be used, exactly to avoid problems like
> above with preempion enabled in .config.
>
> Instead it should be replaced with a get_cpu()/put_cpu() pair that is exactly
> meant to fix bugs like this and define proper critical sections around the per-
> cpu variables.
>
> #define get_cpu() ({ preempt_disable(); smp_processor_id(); })
> #define put_cpu() preempt_enable()
>
> After you find where that smp_processor_id() is located, you should simply
> replace it with a get_cpu() and then you should insert a put_cpu immediately
> after the "cpu" info is not used anymore. That will define a proper and strict
> critical section around the use of the per-cpu variables.
>
> With a ppc vmlinux it should be immediate to find the location of
> smp_processor_id but I don't have the ppc vmlinux here.

Thanks Andrea for the details description. It is really helpful

I will look into this.

Thanks
-Bharat

>
> Thanks!
> Andrea
>
> >
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> > > b/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c index d67db4b..6bf8459 100644
> > > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> > > @@ -563,8 +563,10 @@ static void hugetlb_free_pmd_range(struct mmu_gather
> *tlb, pud_t *pud,
> > > */
> > > next = addr + (1 << hugepd_shift(*(hugepd_t *)pmd));
> > > #endif
> > > + preempt_disable();
> > > free_hugepd_range(tlb, (hugepd_t *)pmd, PMD_SHIFT,
> > > addr, next, floor, ceiling);
> > > + preempt_enable();
> > > } while (addr = next, addr != end);
> > >
> > > start &= PUD_MASK;
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > -Bharat
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc"
> > > in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo
> > > info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >