From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH kvm-next 2/2] kvm: remove dead code Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 14:27:20 -0800 Message-ID: <20131230142720.2802b3b1@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> References: <20131229121229.19a97822@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <20131229121308.58f2a077@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <20131230073715.GB6244@minantech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Cornelia Huck To: Gleb Natapov Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com ([209.85.192.172]:60738 "EHLO mail-pd0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932299Ab3L3W1X (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Dec 2013 17:27:23 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f172.google.com with SMTP id g10so11737533pdj.31 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 14:27:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20131230073715.GB6244@minantech.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 09:37:15 +0200 Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:13:08PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > The function kvm_io_bus_read_cookie is defined but never used > > in current in-tree code. > > > It was added recently by Cornelia (copied) with intention to be used in s390 > code. I assume the intention is still there. The normal process is that the code is added in one patch just before the code that uses it. Rather than the "if we build it they will come" philosophy.