From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7 RESEND] target-i386: Simplify
 kvm_cpu_fill_host() and kvm_check_features_against_host()
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:51:11 +0200
Message-ID: <20140120225111.GA15210@redhat.com>
References: <1390236074-21533-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
	<20140120183656.GF24353@otherpad.lan.raisama.net>
	<20140120203923.GD14528@redhat.com> <52DD9023.2060204@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
To: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Return-path: <qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52DD9023.2060204@suse.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org
Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:07:47PM +0100, Andreas F=E4rber wrote:
> Am 20.01.2014 21:39, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 04:36:56PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:41:07PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >>> Resend of series submitted on 24 November 2013, that didn't get any=
 reply. Only
> >>> change is a trivial conflict on patch 7/7.
> >>
> >> Question: which tree is the most appropriate to get this in? qom-cpu=
?
> >> kvm?
> >=20
> > Either kvm or my pc tree.
> > Seems unrelated to qom.
>=20
> Seems unrelated to PC. ;) I've been maintaining target-i386/cpu.c as
> part of my QOM CPU tree according to MAINTAINERS.

Ah, right. Cool, the less work for me the better.

> I don't mind whether this goes through Paolo's or my tree, but for me t=
o
> take KVM related changes, I expect review from the KVM side.
>=20
> > Paolo - want to review and take this?
>=20
> Regards,
> Andreas
>=20
> >>>  target-i386/cpu.c | 89 +++++++++++++------------------------------=
------------
> >>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
>=20
> --=20
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany
> GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrn=
berg