From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] ARM: KVM: introduce per-vcpu HYP
 Configuration Register
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 11:01:48 +0000
Message-ID: <20140206110147.GF29446@arm.com>
References: <1391630151-7875-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
 <1391630151-7875-10-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from fw-tnat.austin.arm.com ([217.140.110.23]:56450 "EHLO
	collaborate-mta1.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754010AbaBFLC0 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 6 Feb 2014 06:02:26 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1391630151-7875-10-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 07:55:49PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> So far, KVM/ARM used a fixed HCR configuration per guest, except for
> the VI/VF/VA bits to control the interrupt in absence of VGIC.
> 
> With the upcoming need to dynamically reconfigure trapping, it becomes
> necessary to allow the HCR to be changed on a per-vcpu basis.
> 
> The fix here is to mimic what KVM/arm64 already does: a per vcpu HCR
> field, initialized at setup time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>