From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kurz Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PPC: KVM: fix RESUME_GUEST checks Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:14:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20140207091408.5d86bc07@bahia.local> References: <20140206163650.3074.8111.stgit@bahia.lab.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org mailing list" , kvm-ppc , Alexey Kardashevskiy , Paul Mackerras , "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Alexander Graf Return-path: Received: from e06smtp17.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.113]:48981 "EHLO e06smtp17.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751540AbaBGIOS (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Feb 2014 03:14:18 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp17.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:14:17 -0000 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 18:39:30 +0100 Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 06.02.2014, at 17:36, Greg Kurz wrote: > > > As discussed in this thread: > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/309166/ > > > > We need some consistency in the way we check whether the guest > > should resume or not because: > > - new RESUME_GUEST_XXX values may show up > > - more locations in KVM may need to perform a similar check > > > > This serie introduces a helper and patches the locations where it > > should be called. There is yet another location in __kvmppc_vcpu_run, > > but it is assembly and cannot call a C inlined function. > > Thanks, applied all to kvm-ppc-queue. I think the splitting on this one > is quite excessive - a single patch would've done :). > > > Alex > Heh... I paranoid ! :) Thanks Alex ! -- Greg