public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	alex.williamson@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, gleb@kernel.org,
	jan.kiszka@siemens.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] KVM: vmx: Allow the guest to run with dirty debug registers
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 19:26:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140309182639.GA10479@potion.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394192571-11056-5-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>

2014-03-07 12:42+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> When not running in guest-debug mode (i.e. the guest controls the debug
> registers, having to take an exit for each DR access is a waste of time.
> If the guest gets into a state where each context switch causes DR to be
> saved and restored, this can take away as much as 40% of the execution
> time from the guest.
> 
> If the guest is running with vcpu->arch.db == vcpu->arch.eff_db, we
> can let it write freely to the debug registers and reload them on the
> next exit.  We still need to exit on the first access, so that the
> KVM_DEBUGREG_WONT_EXIT flag is set in switch_db_regs; after that, further
> accesses to the debug registers will not cause a vmexit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 06e4ec877a1c..e377522408b1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -2843,7 +2843,7 @@ static __init int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf)
>  		      vmx_capability.ept, vmx_capability.vpid);
>  	}
>  
> -	min = 0;
> +	min = VM_EXIT_SAVE_DEBUG_CONTROLS;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>  	min |= VM_EXIT_HOST_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE;
>  #endif
> @@ -5113,6 +5113,22 @@ static int handle_dr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	if (vcpu->guest_debug == 0) {
> +		u32 cpu_based_vm_exec_control;
> +
> +		cpu_based_vm_exec_control = vmcs_read32(CPU_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL);
> +		cpu_based_vm_exec_control &= ~CPU_BASED_MOV_DR_EXITING;
> +		vmcs_write32(CPU_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, cpu_based_vm_exec_control);

vmcs_clear_bits() covers exactly this use-case.
(Barring the explicit bit-width.)

> +
> +		/*
> +		 * No more DR vmexits; force a reload of the debug registers
> +		 * and reenter on this instruction.  The next vmexit will
> +		 * retrieve the full state of the debug registers.
> +		 */
> +		vcpu->arch.switch_db_regs |= KVM_DEBUGREG_WONT_EXIT;
> +		return 1;
> +	}
> +

We could make the code slighly uglier and move the functional part of
this block before the previous one, so it would do both things in one
exit.  (Exception handler will likely access DR too.)

>  	exit_qualification = vmcs_readl(EXIT_QUALIFICATION);
>  	dr = exit_qualification & DEBUG_REG_ACCESS_NUM;
>  	reg = DEBUG_REG_ACCESS_REG(exit_qualification);
> @@ -5139,6 +5155,24 @@ static void vmx_set_dr6(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long val)
>  {
>  }
>  
> +static void vmx_sync_dirty_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	u32 cpu_based_vm_exec_control;
> +
> +	get_debugreg(vcpu->arch.db[0], 0);
> +	get_debugreg(vcpu->arch.db[1], 1);
> +	get_debugreg(vcpu->arch.db[2], 2);
> +	get_debugreg(vcpu->arch.db[3], 3);
> +	get_debugreg(vcpu->arch.dr6, 6);
> +	vcpu->arch.dr7 = vmcs_readl(GUEST_DR7);
> +
> +	vcpu->arch.switch_db_regs &= ~KVM_DEBUGREG_WONT_EXIT;
> +
> +	cpu_based_vm_exec_control = vmcs_read32(CPU_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL);
> +	cpu_based_vm_exec_control |= CPU_BASED_MOV_DR_EXITING;
> +	vmcs_write32(CPU_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, cpu_based_vm_exec_control);

(I'll be calling this sneaky later on.)

> +}
> +
>  static void vmx_set_dr7(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long val)
>  {
>  	vmcs_writel(GUEST_DR7, val);
> @@ -8590,6 +8624,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops = {
>  	.get_dr6 = vmx_get_dr6,
>  	.set_dr6 = vmx_set_dr6,
>  	.set_dr7 = vmx_set_dr7,
> +	.sync_dirty_debug_regs = vmx_sync_dirty_debug_regs,
>  	.cache_reg = vmx_cache_reg,
>  	.get_rflags = vmx_get_rflags,
>  	.set_rflags = vmx_set_rflags,
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-09 18:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-07 11:42 [PATCH 0/7] KVM: x86: Let the guest write to multiple debug registers with one vmexit Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-07 11:42 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: vmx: we do rely on loading DR7 on entry Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-07 11:42 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: x86: change vcpu->arch.switch_db_regs to a bit mask Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-07 11:42 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: x86: Allow the guest to run with dirty debug registers Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-09 18:28   ` Radim Krčmář
2014-03-09 20:07     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-10 12:11       ` Radim Krčmář
2014-03-07 11:42 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: vmx: " Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-09 18:26   ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2014-03-09 20:12     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-10 12:17       ` Radim Krčmář
2014-03-10 12:24         ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-07 11:42 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: nVMX: Allow nested guests " Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-07 11:42 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: svm: set/clear all DR intercepts in one swoop Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-07 11:42 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: svm: Allow the guest to run with dirty debug registers Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-09  8:11 ` [PATCH 0/7] KVM: x86: Let the guest write to multiple debug registers with one vmexit Jan Kiszka
2014-03-09  8:15   ` Jan Kiszka
2014-03-09  8:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-10 12:23 ` Radim Krčmář

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140309182639.GA10479@potion.redhat.com \
    --to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox